Yamaha AVENTAGE RX-A880 7.2-Channel Network A/V Receiver with Dolby Atmos, 7 HDMI Inputs and Multipoint YPAO

In 2015, I bought a Yamaha RX-1000. V679 AV Receiver is a receiver that is capable of receiving audio and video signals. It had been years since I had bought a new AV receiver, so I was blown away. The power and sound quality were exactly what I expected from a high-end receiver, but the features and ease of setup blew me away. However, two of the five HDMI input ports failed in less than three years. I was still so taken aback by Yamaha that I bought it again - the RX- A880. the additional HDMI ports, as well as all ports that support HDCP 2. In my entertainment system, 2 would be beneficial. The loss of power was the first disappointment. br>br> To keep the same price as the previous receiver, we had to reduce the output power by 50W, which meant we were now purchasing from the Yamaha's "mid-range" line, which was more noticeable than I expected, and the pricing removed a lot of the "bang for your buck. " That alone should be enough to make you think about switching to a different brand. br>br>However, it was the features that were the real letdown. All of the apps that had wowed me on the previous model (Pandora, etc. ) are now available on the new model. ) had switched from standalone embedded apps on the receiver to "MusicCast," in which the app is run by an external device and the receiver serves as a conduit for the sound to reach the speakers. To make matters worse, the apps are only compatible with iPhones and iPads. Even on Windows tablets and computers, this is not the case. The device in our cabinet was reduced to nothing more than a switch as a result of this. Basically, any serious device you'd connect to an AV receiver has enough power that the receiver is always set to "Straight" in our system. There is no audible "enhancement" used in this case. It's just a power amplifier and a video switch without the extra features. br>br>However, the receiver does have a couple of advantages. The device's setup is still simple, but it does give you access to a variety of settings that make it a great switch.

Ariana Goodwin

| Aug 03, 2021

Please accept my apologies for taking so long to write this review. I wanted to be as specific as possible for anyone who sees this as a significant investment. I intended to keep it brief, but that was not possible. I hope you find my review to be entertaining. br>br>I've had the Yamaha RX-1000 for quite some time now. For the past 5 months, I've been using the A880 and the Denon X3500H. I discovered some significant differences that distinguish the RX-100 from the RX-1000. In terms of technology and ability to personalize, the A880 is by far the superior receiver. I'd even argue that the YPAO version of the 880 is superior to the Audyssey XT32 from Denon for either of my speaker setups (Klipsch or Elac). br>br>It might be a fair argument to make if the competition between these two models was deemed unfair because the Yamaha is a 2019 model and the Denon is a 2018. In comparison to the nearly identically priced Denon model, the Yamaha has a significant number of features. The prices are quite different now, with the Yamaha costing $900 and the Denon costing around $550. However, the Yamaha cost me $600, while the Denon cost me $550. The Yamaha was a far better deal. br>br>The main difference is DSP, which simply means a better sound experience overall. The DSP correction is built into the 880. It has the ability to select which bands it wants to listen to from a list of probably 50 or more in the Frequency Range. The Denon is equipped with a pre-amplifier. The Yamaha also has Q and on-board equalizers, allowing the user to select which bands they want to equalize. The Q adjustments tighten up the adjusted band or make the curve more elongated, as shown on the screen. The Denon does not provide you with this level of control. As a result, here's what I'm saying: The Yamaha has built-in what I would consider a $300 tech feature that will make a world of difference between these two top-notch receivers. br>br>Let me quickly explain how this affects my Elac system. The Yamaha is able to extract bass from the Elac UB5, but only by adjusting the bands in the lower and upper bass around 80hz. To get an even bass out of my Elac, which is near a wall in my bedroom, extra attention to how the bass frequencies are adjusted is required. This is something that the Yamaha excels at. The Denon simply converts them to 150hz and sends all of the bass to my sub. Both methods are satisfactory, but I prefer the Elac's bass performance. They make it sound as if the bass is "rolling" inside the speaker. The UB5 has always impressed me in this way. My Elac still sounds great with the Denon, but I don't get the same interesting personality from the UB5's bass. br>br>Another huge feature that I notice from the Yamaha is a technology that eliminates echoes. I had assumed that Audyssey XT32 was the king of room correction, but I was mistaken. The echo/reflection cancellation technology on the 880 is fantastic. The Denon, on the other hand, did not completely eliminate echo. My Klipsch RP280F had the most noticeable bass problem. The Denon simply produces bloated bass, whereas the Yamaha smooths it out. With the Klipsch, I was never able to get the Denon to do what I wanted. br>br>Yamaha lets you run YPAO and then make changes to the flat or "natural" sound wherever you want. As I previously stated, you can adjust each speaker individually and have a lot more controllability (adjust Q, band, etc. ). Denon only allows you to copy over flat and control all speakers as one or just the front two. There is a significant distinction. The Yamaha has a smooth and natural sound. br>br> The Denon has a lot more life and excitement to it. Both have clear sound, but the Yamaha's smoothness appeals to me more. I don't care for the Denon because it's too loud. With the Elac, the Denon sounds great, but with the Klipsch, I wouldn't recommend it. The two are far too similar in nature, and as a result, they are both uninteresting and difficult to listen to. If I'm being honest, the Yamaha makes the Elacs sound a little dead and dull; most of the time, it was enjoyable, and the Yamaha added more musical depth to the recordings that went well with the pairing, but it was too often uninteresting. It could be argued that the Denon does some things better with the Elac at the expense of nailing the UB5's bass. Also, for some reason, the Denon always claims that the Elacs are phased incorrectly, despite the fact that they are properly connected. Everything appears to be fine after I ignore the warning; it's just odd. br>br>With the Klipsch RP horn speakers, the Yamaha is absolute perfection. The music has a big, open sound. The bass is lively and vivacious, as well as being well-controlled, powerful, and articulated. The biggest issue, if there is one, is that Klipsch isn't the absolute best in terms of resolution - They don't have the sound of studio monitors - They sound like they're performing a large-scale live dramatic theatrical production. It took me 5 months to get here, but I've grown to appreciate these massive Klipsch speakers, and I can now understand why everyone raves about them. It's a no-brainer to go with the Yamaha instead of the Klipsch. Last but not least, I will never recommend the Denon X3500H over the Yamaha RX-1000. A880. I will always recommend the Yamaha because of its high-quality features. Think of a built-in miniDSP that Yamaha knows how to implement flawlessly, or nearly flawlessly. The Denon can't really compete with the Elac, but it does a good job with it. However, if you use the Denon, you might lose the bass from your UB5, which is a shame.

Cristian Dodson

| Jul 06, 2021

I've been underwhelmed by the last three receivers I've bought in the last ten years. This time, I opted for a higher-end (for me) receiver (the Yamaha RX-1000). A880) and I have not been let down. I couldn't get the sound I wanted with lower-cost receivers (under $500). The RX, on the other hand, The A880 is a great choice. It has enough power to drive the speakers without distortion even when the music is at its loudest. Lower-end receivers simply aren't capable of delivering the necessary power to properly drive my Polk audio speakers. I used to be able to turn the volume all the way up and not be blown away with previous receivers. I don't think I've ever been able to turn up the volume past half-way with this receiver. (I like my rock and roll loud, so this is very impressive. ) )br>br>However, there are a few issues that keep me from giving 5 stars: I wish it allowed you to create meaningful descriptions for the inputs that appear on-screen. while changing sources on the screen It can be difficult to locate the information you require. Second, their documentation needs to be improved. It's crucial to let the system know where your speakers are located. That should be bolded and described in detail. Last but not least, switching sources takes longer than I expected, and I'd like instance sync/display when switching sources. br>br>I'd give it a 4 out of 5 star rating. If I could, I'd give it a five-star rating. It's nearly flawless.

Aryan Wiley

| Jun 18, 2021