Woodpeckers Precision Woodworking Square 6" x 4", Wall-Mountable, Imperial
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
I hope this helps. The long side is 1 1/4" and the bottom, or short side, is 1 3/8".
It's extremely tough, but it's made of aluminum. I use it in my shop and try to treat it with care because it is a costly precision tool. I wouldn't want to drop it on concrete, but it's bound to happen at some point, and I don't believe it will harm the tool. If I needed the precision that this square provides on a job site, I wouldn't hesitate to use it, but I would treat it with care and not throw it in the back of the truck at the end of the day. I hope this has been of assistance.
Independent laboratory testing is something I'm not familiar with. I've put all of my squares to the test against the Woodpeckers. The Woodpeckers were victorious by a large margin. Any square will suffice if you're constructing a house, barn, or other rough-wood project. When you start working with high-priced wood ($/sq. ft.), it's easy to get carried away. ft. The Woodpecker squares will be a big hit with you. Especially if you're not using a pencil and are using a scribe instead.
Selected User Reviews For Woodpeckers Precision Woodworking Square 6" x 4", Wall-Mountable, Imperial
I own several Woodpeckers tools and have always admired their aesthetics. Unfortunately, the design of this square does not match that of other Woodpeckers tools, though the quality is unquestionably high. The biggest issue I have is that the stock is wider than 1", resulting in a 1/8" difference in scale between the inside and outside of the blade. This square would be significantly more useful if the stock was only 1" wide. Also, because the blade is so thick, it's difficult to tell if you're making precise marks. They lay- The flat feature is fantastic, but for $90, it should not have the flaws I've identified.
The aluminum is extremely pliable. I dropped it on my work surface and on the concrete floor, and it didn't hold up very well, despite the fact that it was entirely my fault. I believe it is not worth the money. For a lot less money, you can get the same level of precision from other manufacturers. This is strictly for the sake of indulgence, and I would not advise it. br>br>You can see these mounted to the walls of all these youtubers (paid promoters). You've figured it out. br>br>If you found this useful, please click the following link:.
My square was clearly marked as pre-ordered when it arrived. I expected more from a $100 item that normally costs $5 at my local hardware store, but it was used, dirty, and covered in saw dust. It's almost as if they didn't even inspect the returned item before sending it out again. I'd expect more from a company whose reputation is built on high-quality products and service. br>br>Square, on the other hand, appears to be well-made and long-lasting. I haven't yet tested the accuracy, but it appears to be of good quality.
After discovering that the square I had been using for several years was not actually square, I purchased this product in September of 2017. After reading the accuracy guarantee and considering Woodpeckers' legendary status in the woodworking community, I chose this square. So far I have 100% been satisfied. br>br>Because this square costs a lot of money for such a basic tool, it's probably not for the average hobbyist. When I received my square, the first thing I did was check the accuracy of the product by placing it against a known straightedge and scribing a line on the inside of the blade. br>br>A hobbyist could probably get away with a less expensive brand. br>br>When I received my square, the first thing I did was check the accuracy of the product by placing it against a known straightedge and scribing a line on the inside of the blade. I then flipped the square over and scribed a second line parallel to the first, which was exactly parallel to my eye. I then used calipers to measure the lines and found that they were dead-on. in close proximity to each other Because the lines were parallel, I was able to determine that the square was exactly 90 degrees. br>br>This square has a lot of other features that I enjoy. In my shop, for example, the "shelf" that runs along the inside of the square's body is very useful. This "shelf" allows the square to rest on a workpiece's edge rather than tipping over, as most squares do. The notch on the inside of the square, where the blade meets the body, is another attractive feature. This notch makes it possible to get a pencil all the way down to the bottom corner, ensuring accuracy. The accuracy of all the square's constituent pieces is another feature that I would not use but have found to be amazing. The blade is a quarter-inch thick, and the body is a quarter-inch thick. When checking the thickness of stock quickly, this has come in handy. The anodized red finish is the final feature I like. The square's only flaw is that it is made of aluminum. br>br>The finish is durable and pleasing to the eye, and it feels good in the hand. br>br>The square's only flaw is that it is made of aluminum. While this is adequate for woodworking, it makes me more cautious about dropping and damaging the tool. This problem, on the other hand, has almost completely resolved itself because I am not much more careful with the tool and thus unlikely to drop it. br>br>Overall, I would strongly advise this product to non-technical users. Woodworker who enjoys doing it as a hobby. It provides unrivaled peace of mind and is extremely easy to use.
It isn't worth the money - honest - I'm afraid of scratching or dropping it if I use it - Very well-made, but it should cost no more than $30. If it gets damaged, which it will, I won't be able to afford to replace it. Unless they make significant price adjustments, I will not purchase any more items from this company - Sorry, nice tools, but too expensive for most people.
I realize these are pricey, but I've only ever had cheap squares from hardware stores up until now. I was unable to locate any mid-priced items. In reviews, there were no range squares that looked suspicious. br>br>In the end, Woodpecker was only a little more expensive than the mid-range squares, and it seemed to be widely regarded for accuracy, so I paid a little more and got this. So far, I haven't had any regrets.
The 851 square is a huge improvement over what I've been using for a long time; the CNC machining is spot on, and the white numbers and lines are very easy to see, unlike my old one, which was not marked like the Woodpeckers tools are; I'm giving it 5 stars for its quality rather than its price.
It also appears to be fantastic! I'd be lying if I said I didn't think vanity played a role in this purchase. Exudes contemporary craftsmanship and functionality that is commensurate with the price tag.