Advanced GQ EMF-380 V2 Multi-Field Electromagnetic Radiation 3-in-1 EMF ELF Meter RF Spectrum Analyzer Ghost Cell Tower Smart Meter WiFi hiden Spy Camera Signal Bug Detector RF up to 8G

For years, I've been concerned about Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Radio Frequency (RF) radiation, so I purchased this. This company was rated as one of the best testing devices on one website I came across. If you're only testing a few items, it's simple to use. However, if you want to learn about the other features, there is a steep learning curve. The visual graphics could be better, but the layout is straightforward, and it will show you if you're picking up EMFs in both RF and EF. It will also indicate whether the noise is coming from power lines, a WiFi phone, or a combination of the two. It'll also demonstrate the EMF's power. Normal, medium, or high are the three options. When the EMF is high, a green light flashes and beeps; when the EMF is extremely high, the light turns red. I discovered the following: EMF levels are high in wireless home landlines, microwave ovens, IPads, and smart phones. I discovered the following: When a microwave oven is in use, stay away from it. Make the switch from a cordless to a corded phone at home. When viewing the IPad, use a wired earphone piece in your smartphone or speakerphone and place it on your desk. Surprisingly, my 5th place finish was unexpected. 0 and 2. It wasn't an issue with the 4 gig router unless I was holding the EMF- At a distance of a few inches from the router, dial in 380. The EMF began to beep in the "high" range at that distance.

Robin Richard

| Feb 16, 2021

RF meter with a lot of features made in the United States. When I saw V/m on the meter, I assumed it meant signal strength (field intensity) for the RF field, but it was actually for the electrical field. However, after contacting the manufacturer, they updated their firmware to show the power density reading for the RF field (which did not display initially) in nanowatts/cm2 (from which you can calculate field intensity strength in V/m), microwatts/cm2, or milliwatts/cm2, as well as the maximum total power density since the meter was turned on. Shows the total power in a band as well as the total power density. You won't have to buy new batteries because it comes with a rechargeable lithium battery that you can charge through your computer's USB port. It has a lot more features than most meters under $300, such as an RF spectrum analyzer that shows total power, total power density, and dbm for six frequency bands, some radio, some microwave, so you can see what radiation comes from radio towers and cell phone towers implicated in some cancer and other disease risk studies. I tested this meter on a variety of wi-f enabled devices and found it to be very accurate. I even compared it to a trifield analog meter (the needle type of meter, which is not sensitive in the low range) and found that the results in the higher range above 50 microwatts were sometimes very similar. I'm not an electrical engineer, so I'm not sure how accurate this thing or trifield analog is, but it detects two. 4 GHz microwave oven signal (do not sit near your microwave and keep your laptop away from you, as the radiation near wi-fi phones and laptops is high, similar to that near a microwave oven). If you want a feature added or improved, these guys are eager to do so because they update the firmware based on email requests, which most manufacturers do not do. As a result, this is a significant benefit. Future versions of this, I believe, will be significantly improved. RF has six bands, ranging from 153 to 174 MHz. 534 KHz, 520 KHz, 534 KHz, 534 KHz, 534 K The frequency is 1710 KHz, with a second frequency of 1710 KHz. 64-bit processing at 23 MHz 108 MHz, 240-volt power supply The frequency is 1040 MHz, and the frequency is divided into two parts. 5 GHz. The microwave spectrum as a whole has a range of zero. According to the manufacturer's emails, the range is now 24 to 7 GHz, a broad range that will be expanded in future versions. This meter has the most features of any I've seen. The magnetic meter, I believe, is very accurate, as it matches the trifield analog perfectly many times, the mGauss that the EPA says must be below 2 mGauss when you are 1 foot from the monitor, according to the EPA. The trifield analog, a popular meter that has been around for 20 years, has an electrical field that matches it. Even though it is not currently available in every online emf store, this meter has the potential to become very popular. It has a speaker and an alarm, and you can program it to beep when the mGauss, V/m, and other parameters exceed a certain threshold. I measured several cars and was frequently surprised to discover that gasoline cars have stronger magnetic fields than electric cars (I could only test one electric car, mine). This meter is better than the 360 version when it comes to picking up cell phone signals. ) In an electric car, there are no extra RF and EMF, which is great news. I believe that the magnetic measurement is superior to the trifield analog in this case. Since many people get sick near cell phone towers, one thing I've discovered is that going inside a building reduces exposure, and people who are sensitive can use RF blocking paint or aluminum foil to reduce exposure if they're sensitive. If you're very concerned about RF (radio and microwave frequencies) and want to do a lot of research on these frequencies, perhaps you can buy several meters and see what each one does and says the level is at, and go from there - Because, to be honest, I'm not a physics expert and don't have multiple digital meters with which to compare all of the readings. The RF graph shows the frequency of a large signal, which is a nice feature. This meter may not be perfect for some people in every way, and it may not pick up everything one wants to pick up (every band and every phone brand, for example), but it is educational, and teachers can probably use it to teach about power density, field intensity, electrosmog, and RF smog, among other things. Hopefully, this was of assistance to you. ) From watching videos on school websites using wi-fi, it appears that this meter produces roughly the same RF field values as the meters in those videos. One video got 21565 nanowatts/cm2 for being close to a laptop with wi-fi, which is what I get with this one far too often, especially when loading stuff. Wi-Fi detection, which has been a source of concern for many teachers and parents, is excellent. Wi-Fi is number two. Peaks appear and disappear in the 5 GHz band. For certain cell phone brands, readings are occasionally lower than trifield analog, but this is a 5 star product for the price. There are advantages and disadvantages to every meter. the trifield's TF2. This one can display dozens of numbers, spectra frequencies, and so on, whereas com only displays two numbers. Give it a shot, and if you don't like it, send an email with your questions or request a firmware update or return it.

Harrison Cantu

| Jul 20, 2021

No one else compares in terms of value for money. I have two GQ devices, both of which have the same form factor, which I like because it allows them to be used as a pair. Although the meter functions well, there is a learning curve. The majority of the positive aspects were covered in the previous review, so I'll concentrate on the "needs improvement" aspects. The processor could use a little more speed, and it can be a little unresponsive to button presses at times. You can't set the units in RF mode, so it constantly switches between different ones, requiring you to keep track of that as well as the values. I am confident that the lack of measurement unit control will be addressed in future firmware. That is really the only criticism I have; for the price, it is far superior to any other meter and is a joy to use. Because the value is so high, I didn't reduce the rating to four stars. I'll probably add to this over the next month because I've only had it for two days. I'd also like to point out that GQ Electronics is a pleasure to work with and responds to questions and concerns promptly. I want to say what's good and what's bad about this device for many reasons, but since I have already had time with it and it is relatively simple to use, I can compare it against it. The Spectrum analyzer also isn't as handy as a standalone unit;.

Alexis Cowan

| May 06, 2021