Casio Women's BA-111-1ACR Baby-G Analog-Digital Display Quartz Black Watch

The colors are beautiful, but it's difficult to read because it's so dark. The figures are small and difficult to read. It's not helped by the light. It became easier to see the hands after a few days of wearing it, but they don't stand out as much in the sun as they do in the photo. It was returned because reading it took too long.

Adam Shaffer

| Sep 05, 2021

This watch has a very appealing design. You'll be able to see the screen fine as long as you're in a well-lit environment; if you're in a dimly lit environment, you won't be able to read any of the digital numbers. While reading the digital time in the dark is nearly impossible, the analog clock hands are visible in both light and dark environments. Because the light only lasts about two seconds, you'll have to be quick to read the time. br>I'm disappointed that the light is at the bottom of the watch, which makes it difficult to read the digital time; it would have been nice if the watch was backlit like the digital Baby-G. In my digital Baby-sitter, the watch dies. G, so I opted for the analog approach instead. To keep track of my husband's seizures, I purchased this watch. It was critical for me to be able to read the seconds in digital format. Because of the lighting, I am unable to see. I would have been content if there had been an analog second hand. Casio needs to step up and fix this immediately. I simply desired a watch with a mature appearance that matched my demeanor. The ability to keep track of seconds in real time was the most important factor. There was no way the watch could have saved me.

Alfredo Barry

| May 02, 2021

It's exactly what I've been looking for. It's very comfortable and stylish. BUT. However, it is difficult to read the face of it in terms of function. I'm the proud owner of a white baby girl. I'm a big fan of G-Shock. however, for the rest of the not-so-famous-famous-famous I needed something darker and more appropriate for the summer months. The color scheme is fantastic. However, the watch's face is so dark that everything blends together. The pink digital elements (weekday, date) are also cool. looking, but it's difficult to read once more. The watch's most amazing feature is - It sets itself up in some mysterious way (clearly, I'm not very tech-savvy). savvy). The hands begin spinning after you select your time zone city and whether or not you want to use daylight savings time. This is fantastic. But, given how difficult it is to read, I'm not sure I can recommend it strongly enough. If I had known, I would have chosen another option.

Alonso Lim

| Jul 23, 2021

Pros: The watch has a great look to it and appears to be very sturdy.
Cons: (1)it's a pain to setbr>(2) you can barely see the digital numbers like your month, day, and year; it's almost like a second-rate watch, not a first-rate watch, because the original price is $125. 00 I'm guessing everything is legible, but for the price I paid, considering you can't see the numbers, it's still a bit pricey. Instead of this watch, I felt like I should have bought something else.

Amelie Colling

| Oct 29, 2021

I adore the watch's overall appearance; it's stunning, and it's G-rated. I was shocked, but I couldn't see the display. The digital portion of the screen cannot be seen even with the night light on because it is a negative screen with a black background. The analog portion of the watch is also difficult to see due to the watch's overall darkness and dimness. The light is insufficient to illuminate the hands or the digital portion of the screen. I liked how it looked, but I needed it to keep track of time. For the sake of appearances, no.

Adan Farrell

| Mar 01, 2021

This watch has so many issues with it, from the battery dying quickly because it's likely been sitting in a warehouse for a long time to the watch having very itchy rubber for a band to the time constantly losing and trying to set this is a nightmare, so we took it to someone else and they said this watch isn't very good. This is just an opinion of someone we took it to.

Eithan Daugherty

| May 08, 2021

The timepiece is of high quality. I have nothing nice to say about the hands except that they are feminine. br>br> It can be difficult to read digital displays. The "backlight" is aimed at 12 o'clock and is positioned at 6 o'clock. The light is only on for a few seconds, leaving no time to locate the hands. br>br>I've included two photographs, one in natural light and the other in artificial light. When I first opened it, I did so in indirect light. I expected it to be difficult to read the date on the digital screen, but I didn't anticipate disliking the entire experience.

Quentin Gibson

| Mar 13, 2021

It's a very nice little watch, and I like how it looks and how it's styled, but I agree with some reviewers that the light isn't very bright, and the white numbers on black background digital readouts are practically illegible in the dark, though the pink tips on the hands make them fairly easy to see in low light. I'm looking forward to seeing how this new Casio compares to my previous Casio, which I purchased in 2005. In 2037, I'll probably update this review and see if it's still working. After that, I'll see you.

Tristan Kemp

| May 10, 2021