AKG Pro Audio P220 Vocal Condenser Microphone, Black

Listen up, this is going to be the most truthful review you'll ever read. Those who believe they need to spend more than a certain amount to get that "sound" should toss that idea out the window. What I've been able to accomplish with these "under $200" microphones would irritate the vast majority of people who have spent thousands of dollars on microphones. A mic is just one of the many components that go into making a QUALITY recording. Furthermore, variables such as the room/environment, plug-ins, and pre-production are all taken into consideration. The amps, as well as the person doing the recording, all contribute to the overall sound you'll get. The first time I used this AKG, I was completely blown away. It's the most accurate mic for the money—what I mean is that you sound exactly like the person you're recording. There isn't any unnecessary fluff here. It provided precise frequency response while also keeping the vocal tight and warm. This was recorded without the use of a preamp, straight into my FastTrack Pro (nothing fancy). I was blown away by the quality for the price, which should be the first rule of the game: QUALITY OVER QUANTITY. Anyone, from a novice to a seasoned engineer, should consider purchasing this mic. P. br>br>P. br>br>P. br>br>P. Make sure your brother (or sister) doesn't drop the microphone! Keep an eye on your belongings!.

Kase Lindsey

| Jul 13, 2021

I've had the AKG Perception 120 (old model) for quite some time and have never had any issues with it. The P220 was purchased primarily so that I could change my setup to have one microphone for recording vocals (the P220) and another microphone for recording YouTube videos (the Perception 120). The Perception 120 is fitted with the P220's shock mount, which is a perfect fit for the mic. I figured it would work because the mics are nearly identical in size. The P220 has a rugged and tough build quality, and the controls are straightforward. There are two main options for you to choose from: The bass roll off is ideal for recording without having to deal with any unwanted low end frequencies picked up by the mic. The other option reduces the signal by 20 decibels. It's best used, in my opinion, when there's a noisy background that you don't want to bleed into the mic. It essentially isolates the signal so that it can only be heard directly in front of the mic, rather than everywhere else. I'd be lying if I said there weren't some things I didn't like about it (because I adore AKG products), but for some people, this mic may be too basic in comparison to other, more expensive microphones. This mic has a warmer, more direct sound than the AKG Perception 120, so I thought it would be better for vocal recording. In the studio, however, the Perception 120 continues to dominate. Some people may prefer a different sound to that of other mics, but for me, this mic is perfect for my needs. br>br>AKG Perception 120: AKG Perception 120: AKG Perception 120: AKG Perception 120: AKG Perception 120: AKG So, here are my advantages and disadvantages:br>br>AKG Perception P120 Professional Studio Microphone, Silverbr>br> PROS: br>br>
- a low-cost alternativebr>- settings that are easy to understandbr>- br>- adaptable (vocals, guitar, etc. ) CONS (other people's opinions): ruggedbr>br>PROS: ruggedbr>br>PROS: ruggedbr>br>PROS: ruggedbr>br>
- excessively low-costbr>- too basic (insufficient options)br>- sound isn't my favorite flavorbr>- too heavy.

Simon Deleon

| Dec 22, 2020

I read several positive reviews of the P220 mic before ordering, and only discovered a few negative ones afterward (of course). The uneven, harsh response in the upper mids to high end, as well as excessive background noise pickup, were among the complaints. I'm afraid I'll have to agree with you. With my three-year-old son, I had a hard time EQ'ing this out. section parametric, and I can see why by examining some independent response plots: There were multiple resonant peaks, which were larger than the factory plots indicated. It's difficult to round out more peaks than there are EQ bands for those who are new to this: The frequencies you want to keep are squashed. This was compared to an AT2035, which was similar but more tameable via EQ, and a Rode NT-80, which was similar but more tameable via EQ. 1 (rather than "1a"). The NT- I kept the AT2035 for when ambient sounds are the goal, but the NT-S1 was much easier to dial in (pretty much a single, rounded rise in high end) and picked up far less background noise. When you concentrate on what's in front of you, 1 becomes a lot easier to work with. Perhaps I got some strange ducks, as the published polar patterns suggest. Thanks to Amazon's policies, I was able to return it with ease!.

Ian HARGREAVES

| Nov 24, 2021

I've tried a lot of vocal mics and this one is my favorite; seriously, if you're home recording, don't spend a lot of money on a mic; your songs will not sell any better. For this mic, you'll need phantom power, and if you don't know what that is, don't buy anything until you learn more about it. br>br>Alternatively, you could just get a SM57 and plug it into a pop filter and sing. The SM7 (the NPR mic) requires a LOT OF POWER to sound good, so don't buy it unless you already have a powerful preamp. amp. Back to the P220: br>br> It is something you will enjoy. Excellent value for money. Simply get it, and don't succumb to Gear Acquisition Syndrome by buying more microphones in an attempt to emulate Sting or Adele. It's you, not the microphone. And, in any case, no one cares about home recordings, so have a good time. Maintain your day job as well.

Derrick Prince

| Nov 03, 2021

I put this mic through its paces. Based on the positive reviews and low price, I assumed this would be a good microphone for vocals or at the very least stringed instruments. I'm pleased to report that it meets all of my expectations. The sound is warmer than an AT 2035, with less character in the midrange from 430 hz to around 900 hz. I believe the only difference was a loss of clarity in the 5 kHz range. For baritone singers, it turns out to be a great combination. My tenor and alto singers will continue to use the AT 2035. br>br>At this price point, it's difficult to find a mic with a perfectly flat response without some coloring, but it's more about finding cheap mics with the right color (frequency response curves) that fit your application. In this case, I'd recommend it for male singers with deeper voices, as well as acoustic instruments in the viola and cello ranges. I haven't tried it yet, but a medium-sized pumpkin would be a good choice. Low brass could also work well in this setting. Overall, it's hefty, has the right voicing stage for vocal singing and voice-over, and fits a budget that anyone can afford; I think you'll be satisfied if you're looking for a project studio on a budget.

Iker Adams

| Jul 06, 2021