Larsen 4/4 Cello A String Medium Alloy-Steel
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Selected User Reviews For Larsen 4/4 Cello A String Medium Alloy-Steel
It's a little pricey. Larsen's Strong upper strings were superior to the medium ones in my opinion. If you want more projection but don't want the harshness (or price) of the soloist editions, give them a shot. br>br>In my opinion, Larsen strings are the best, but they're also the most expensive; if you want to try something similar, especially with more brightness and projection, go with a Jargar A and D. br>br>These upper strings are usually paired with Spirocore tungsten-coated tungsten-coated Spirocore tungsten-coated Spirocore tungsten-coated Spir Magnacore G and C, wound G and C, Larsen Wirecore G and C The Magnacore G and C strings come highly recommended.
Yes, it came to pass at long last. Today I managed to break a string. Fortunately, I had a Larsen string on hand, which Robert Cauer in Los Angeles had recommended. I'm not sure how anyone could mistake it for an electric guitar string because it went on right away, tuned right up. This string produces bright but mellow tones, and despite not having tried the less expensive alternatives, I'm sticking with Larsen.
I adore Larsen Strings, but this item isn't a string at all! It's a auxiliary for an electric instrument that's been mislabeled. For a genuine Larsen A, I give it 5 stars. I'm hoping someone will be able to resolve this problem.
The string was of excellent quality and arrived promptly.
Jargar strings snapped three times while I was tuning, but it was a good sound and a good price. This, I believe, is of higher quality.
The string snapped after only a week of light use.
This product is not shown in the picture; hopefully, someone will correct this.
The description is accurate. This isn't a cello string, so don't expect it to sound like one. Although the product description matched a Larsen A string, the product that was delivered to my home was a 10 foot Fender cable.