Good Thins Sea Salt Corn Snacks Gluten Free Crackers & Tate's Bake Shop Chocolate Chip Gluten Free Cookies Variety Pack, 4 Packs

When I looked at the ingredients, I noticed that Corn Masa Flour had been replaced with Whole Grain Yellow Corn Meal as the first ingredient. The flavor isn't the same and isn't as satisfying. OK, but the corn flavor is gone. The size of the cracker, as well as the size of the serving, is different (smaller), and crackers contain more iron but less calcium. This is not a step forward. I'm not sure why Nabisco changed it, but it wasn't for the better, and it shouldn't have been marketed as such.

Layla Liu

| May 26, 2021

It's ideal for "Weight Watchers. " I saw these on a Facebook page for Weight Watchers and decided to give them a try. I signed up for an online program to help me lose some weight. These satisfy a crunch and salt craving, with a nice corn chip flavor and a saltiness that isn't overpowering. They are only 3 points on Weight Watchers, with 41 pieces. When I'm watching TV and need something to chew on, I'll have one of these. lol. The crackers are small and thin, but they pack a lot of punch. Even when I'm mindlessly munching, I rarely eat 41 at a time.

Phoenix Valencia

| Mar 17, 2021

Although I like the product, I intend to order from the competition instead because I am dissatisfied with a company's political involvement when it should be neutral. I used to shop on Amazon for everything, but now I'm willing to pay a premium to shop elsewhere.

Rio FINCH

| Feb 09, 2021

I'm on Weight Watchers right now, and 41 of these count as three points. It's how I became so enamored with them in the first place. And the price is great because we eat a lot of them and it's cheaper than buying a box at a time in my local store (retail is usually $2. 50). 50 - In the store, one box costs $3.

Saige Hamilton

| Dec 05, 2021

I bought a box of these to meet a free shipping limit somewhere else, but they tasted like a rice cracker and had a rich corn flavor. I enjoyed my first box so much that I decided to purchase a case. In comparison to the contents, the boxes are quite large. Each box could hold up to three or four bags. I understand the packaging rationale for justifying the price because the chips are light and small, but the taste and quality earn a solid 5 stars (love 'em!). ), and their environmental impact is deceiving, so I'd give it a 3 out of 5 star rating.

Gunnar Boyer

| Jan 24, 2021

I eat a lot of these crackers because I enjoy them so much. I placed an order for two cases, as I had done previously. When I received the boxes, the crackers did not appear to be fresh. I double-checked the expiration date and discovered that they were 6 months old. The majority of the boxes were devoured by me. They weren't the best, but I was willing to put up with the less-than-fresh taste and didn't want to deal with the hassle of complaining about them not being at their best; I'm now on the last five boxes, a few weeks later. They're rotten and unfit to eat. There is no place on the Amazon website where you can express your dissatisfaction with this. I should have filed a complaint as soon as I got the boxes, which were six months past their expiration date. I've ordered these by the case from Amazon several times, but I won't do so again, and I'll be hesitant to order any food items unless they improve their date checking.

Hugh HUSSAIN

| Apr 29, 2021

Tate's gluten-free cookies are difficult to beat. They don't have much of a gluten-free flavor to them. The only telltale sign is how brittle and dry they are, which you should be aware of before proceeding. They're not as bitter or cloying as some others. They're crumbly like Chips Ahoy, but with a lot more natural home-cooked flavor. The chocolate-based dessert It's also nice to have a good cookie-to-cookie ratio. I'm not a fan of chocolate "chunk" cookies that are all chocolate. I want a good cookie first, and then the chocolate chips as a garnish, and Tate's hits the mark.

Barbara Prince

| Sep 23, 2021