Tide Optics CineSoft Lens Filter (49mm) Diffusion Mist Pro Dream Effect
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Selected User Reviews For Tide Optics CineSoft Lens Filter (49mm) Diffusion Mist Pro Dream Effect
It is slim and sturdy in construction. My overall impression is very positive after using this product for a week straight. Generally, I shoot landscapes, and the lens does a very good job in this regard, especially when I am trying to capture a "dreamier" shot with a sunset. Although the diffusion can appear a bit subtle at times when there are no obvious differences in light, in my opinion, it was just enough to achieve the soft look I was trying to achieve, while smoothing skin tones and softening sun rays. I would say that it is also great for portraits. Taking pictures in dark settings with bright light will really show the effect of the smooth light bloom. In general, I like the design a lot as well This device is very slim and nice looking, and the glass and metal casing feel solid and durable. There is no doubt in my mind that this product is worth your consideration!.
The first thing I noticed when I received my device was that it had The process of getting clean was extremely painful. As for the filter itself, it is well made and made from high-quality In reality, unless you shoot in a setting with bright light, the effect is negligible. A/B testing several frames shows that the difference between the two is so subtle that it is hard to tell the difference. It is more or less equivalent to a Tiffen My preference is for something more dramatic to lighten the extremes and make life more manageable.
The diffusion filter that I use is my favorite. In addition to its lack of degradation in quality, it eliminated the harsh digital look that most digital cameras give photographs. If you want to change up the style of your photography or just want to have some fun with how light looks, I definitely recommend.
If you look closely at my photos, you'll be able to see the differences, even with the lower resolution and lower quality settings that Amazon uses for storing its photos. This is what I use on a full-screen computer The Canon 6D is a full-frame camera. A glass and materials that are excellent. Diffusion effect in a neutral color. Pleasant. Here are the most important things you should know if you are familiar with soft/diffuser filters and want to switch to I found this product to be excellent, and have I'd like to have a little discussion. Although this is an interesting class of filter, it isn't for everyone. What would you do if, after spending thousands of dollars on a good camera and the finest lenses, you purchased a filter to intentionally reduce the quality of the image? I know, I know. That's crazy, It's kind of like that. My mind is not one of those who pines for the days when chemical film was analog. The digital technology is worth every penny (which probably just annoyed a bunch of people, but disregard me if you wish. This will give you more of a film look, which means a smaller resolution, a lower contrast, and a degree of blurriness. It happens to me that I like the sharp, contrasty quality of a digital image. this is a big but), this filter still has a place in the world, even for guys like me. This can be useful for balancing things out in portraits, especially if there are textures in the subject's complexion (and you don't want to emphasize them). You can have a pleasant dream while using it- Landscape photos with an atmosphere of dappled light have an almost flowery quality to them, as the highlights tend to bloom a It may be a good idea if I soften my focus, you say. The solution is not quite that straightforward and I'm not sure I can adequately describe it, but the quality of light coming through a diffusion filter, a few inches in front of the sensor, is a little nicer, more professional looking than simply offsetting your focus to Although I won't use this filter a lot, it's still a very useful tool. Normally, I take landscapes and I like them to be as sharp as possible, but there will be times when I take a portrait or a fantasy landscape where this will definitely be a positive advantage for me. This is at least a 4-star rating. I will probably give it a 5 if I can think of more uses for it.
Page 28 of the PDF. I have my other filter, a 67mm filter, and I made a small investment in it. For a starting point, it costs a lot more to buy step-up lenses, so if you're buying filters, buy the biggest you can find I can fit a small lens with a large filter, but the larger filters won't fit on the rings. It's my pleasure to be of service to you. Aside from the fact that, I have used this filter for a range of different photography engagements, from creative lifestyle photography to landscape photography. There was nothing obvious about it, but I found it to be very I did not notice any distortion, vignetting, or "hot" areas in the photo. I see myself using this more and more often as it gives a dreamy look and it surely looks better than the diffusion you can get in post. However, the lens case is garbage and I assume it was only intended for carrying the filter since Tide has the 5 Filter Pouch for sale. Besides that, I am much more pleased with a good performer product than with an inferior performer with a nice package or carrying case, so well done, Tide. Disclaimer This image is for illustration purposes only. The scene where it was compared was very extreme, as a dark room with a light bar 10 feet away was used. We wanted to compare the Moment 20% with my other diffusion filter (in a controlled environment).