GARP 339392 Compatible Replacement for Dryer Lint Screen Fits Crosley, Estate, Inglis, Kenmore, KitchenAid, Roper, Whirlpool
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
The dimensions of this box are 7" wide by 17" long by My dryer fit it, but the quality wasn't the same as the original. This would be a good idea if you are able to repair yours or locate the original equipment.
My reaction when I received it was very disappointed. This is a very flimsy and cheaply made product. The next day, I returned it.
I'm sorry, your part number is WPW10717210. Thank you for your inquiry
Using a square door dryer, open the door, then look at the front where the opening is, for a model number. If it does not show up as a valid model or part, you can use the following method. You could also try putting your brand and model in the area where it says to check Due to the fact that this is a noncommercial product When it comes to OEM parts, you can count on "GARP" to supply a compatible one.
Selected User Reviews For GARP 339392 Compatible Replacement for Dryer Lint Screen Fits Crosley, Estate, Inglis, Kenmore, KitchenAid, Roper, Whirlpool
35 years after buying my original top-of-the-line Whirlpool dryer for $600, I still have it going strong. Over the years, it has required about $200 worth of repairs. It took about 15 years for the extraction handle on the lint filter to break off. At that time I did some research and was quoted $100+ for a Whirlpool OEM replacement filter. Despite my interest, I decided not to buy it because that seemed expensive, and I managed to use the nylon string loop handle I made to keep up with the laundry, which worked fine and continued to work fine for another 15 years, until I found It turned out to be a fair price, so I ordered it, and it arrived on time. As I was looking at the curved screen frame that supports the wire mesh lint screen, I was disappointed to find that it was slightly flimsier and of lower flexibility than This is my keep and I'll keep it As I am using this GARP replacement lint filter because I find that the full size rigid handle is easier to hold than my other string loop handle, I plan to keep my old filter handy for when this new one fails, so I can use it in the interim until the new one Even if I am answered by the power of prayer and my old dryer finally fails, so that I can justify buying a new $1,400 dryer that has steam, WIFI, and is IOT enabled, but will still not dry my clothes faster.
The after market part is designed to fit a variety of Not exactly the same shape as OEM when it comes out of the package. Once the plastic has been used a couple times and has been subjected to the dryer's heat, the fit and function will be satisfactory. This part cost around half of the OEM price and I'm not sure if the new OEM part is or is not exactly like the original. The dryer is very old (about 31 years old) and it's very hard to find parts for it. I've been pleased with this product over all. When there is an old appliance, you really have to consider the cost of repair parts. I did not want to spend twice as much It's a decent part at the right price for me from GARP. *Thank you* *7- *Update for 2016 While I hate to say anything negative, I feel it necessary to provide my updated review of this product. Since using this aftermarket screen only for a couple of months, I wish now that I had paid more for the OEM replacement part when it developed a hole back in June. My contact with the vendor failed the first time and then Amazon made a contact request again I have not heard from the seller as of today and I don't anticipate hearing from him soon. I'm not sure if I should chalk it up to the fact sometimes you just have to pay more for a quality part or if I received a damaged or defective part. The 31 year old original dryer screen was flawless as far as The handle was broken where the plastic welds were located, which led to this failure. The fact that the filter screen is inserted and removed for cleaning confirms that there is no other problem with the machines.
Looking at other reviews (too late for me), it appears that they are having the same issue as I am. On the picture, you can see a grey colored framework with metal ribs at the edges as the lint trap. A cheap, ultra flimsy, all white (almost see through) frame with a screen that was hot glued onto the edges of the frame was what I received! If this lint trap lasts a week, it will be a good one. The value of this is at best 2 dollars. This is very.
Despite what the picture showed, the part I received looks NOTHING like it. was translucent white, lacking ribs and felt Using it is the best route for me. I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt. The material feels very flimsy In my opinion, things aren't looking good.
The screen in my old dryer was falling apart and could barely be put back in the dryer after it was cleaned. There is a lower price on Amazon than at other stores The cost of $30 for something so simple still seems high to me, but I am pleased that I got it so cheap You can clearly see the model number of your dryer when you open it. Be sure to check for compatibility beforehand!.
Here you can see the OEM part that came with my dryer on Amazon's listing. The plastic mesh was sent as is and was not reinforced on the It is not the original part, so do not buy it if you think you are getting it.
In accordance with the serial number on the dryer, my parents have a Kenmore electric dryer from 1969. The manufacturer listed this lint screen as fitting this particular vehicle. The first time I used it, I was very happy with it. I found it to be very comfortable. There have been some minor styling changes to the grab handle, but the lint screen still functions.
I knew what it looked like because I had to replace the screen in my Roper dryer, but it wasn't identical. Getting in and out was much more difficult than it should have been, but hopefully that will ease up with time. Just figured if you are going to list all the dryers it is for, it would fit all the same dryers perfectly, and not some that might be a bit too small. I gave close effort four stars due to that reason.