Continental Grand Prix 5000 Performance Road Bike Tire
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
I've only tried 28mm tires; I haven't tried any other widths. The (28mm) 5000 tires, in my experience, are much narrower than the 4000s II 28mm tires. You can see the difference between the two 28mm tires in a review I wrote on August 29, 2019. For the most part, whether or not the difference is significant is a matter of personal preference.
Yes, in a word. To find out more, do a Google search for "sheldon brown tire sizing." TL; TL; TL; TL; TL; TL; TL; TL; TL; TL DR - br>br>There is no such thing as a "700x28" tire because the designation is misleading. You'll need the "c," which is associated with the 700, not the 28, despite the fact that it's commonly written as "700x28c," for example. People frequently refer to "28c" tires, etc., but including the "c" isn't particularly helpful, as it often leads people, particularly Americans who are unfamiliar with the metric system, to think of 28 centimeters. br>br>"700c" is the ETRTO bead seat diameter of 622 mm. The most perplexing application of this naming style in recent years has been with so-called "superfoods." Wheels and tires with a diameter of 650 are referred to as "650." It is equivalent to ETRTO 571 mm bead seat diameter and is used to refer to 650c sizing used for time trial bikes, recumbents, and small sized or women's road bikes. When people say "650," they usually mean "650b," which is ETRTO 584 mm bead seat diameter, which is now used on all kinds of bikes, usually to accommodate fatter tires while having an effective tire diameter similar to a "700c" with skinnier tires. br>br>I prefer tire sizes such as 28-inch and larger. Because the numbers are meaningful, describing the width and diameter of the bead seat in millimeters, 622 (equivalent to 700x28c) was chosen. The number "700" used to be significant, but it is no longer so. When referred to as "28c," which could refer to a 650x28c or 700x28c tire, the 28 number is meaningful in describing the width, but it becomes muddled when referred to as "28", which could refer to a 650x28c or 700x28c tire, while 28- 28 or 571 The number 622 is clear.
These are priced as singles because the cost would be the same regardless. You should be able to add two items to your shopping cart.
Define what it means to be covered by a camera, and then choose which one to carry. In terms of the decisive denominator, I believe it is because it can only be carried with a camera. On the other hand, you can use it in both ways.
Selected User Reviews For Continental Grand Prix 5000 Performance Road Bike Tire
Update for December 2021: br>It's been a few years since I first used the Conti 5000 tires, and I believe it's time for me to update my review and rating. When the 5000 tires first came out, I gave them a three-star rating because they were about a "size" narrower than the 4000s tires I had been running for several years (both the original and "4000s II" versions). br>br>I still use Conti tires (the "standard" Grand Prix 5000). on all three road bikes (not TR or TL). Based on some online testing results, I like the ride quality and low rolling resistance. I also believe the tires have excellent traction on the types of roads I ride (asphalt roads, cement bike trails). Because I live in a dry climate, I can't comment on the performance on wet roads. br>br>In terms of flat resistance, I haven't noticed any significant improvement - However, based on real-world experience, it is difficult to accurately quantify this. I still get flats now and then, but I don't think they're any more dangerous than any other high-performance tire. In a nutshell, I'm still a Conti fan and love the tires, so I've bumped the rating up to five stars. br>br>The only downside to these tires is that they can be very expensive; if you rarely ride or if budget is a concern, you might want to look for a different tire. br>br>In a nutshell, I'm still a Conti fan and love the tires, so I've bumpe My Specialized Roubaix Pro is equipped with 28mm 5000 tires. When it comes to the much more powerful Co- I use the wider 32mm tires on my motion Carrera tandem (Rolf Carbon Tandem wheels). br>br>Keep in mind that the maximum tire pressure on the 5000 version is lower than on the older 4000 tires, so double-check your sidewalls to avoid overinflating the tires.
- Original Review: Three Stars - br>I'm an experienced rider and a long-time fan of Conti's 4000s tires, which I use exclusively on my road bikes and a Co-Motion. In sync with each other. I've used tires with widths ranging from 23 to 28mm on the tandem, with the 28mm tires being the most popular. I had ordered new Conti 5000 (non tubeless) tires in a 28mm size for the front and back of the tandem to replace the 28mm 4000s II tires that were already on it. br>br>To my dismay, the new 5000 is significantly narrower than the old 4000s. It wasn't until I mounted the front tire that I noticed it was noticeably narrower than the rear tire that I realized what had happened. I've added two photos to this post: The first step is to compare the width of the carcass itself (unmounted) by stacking the two tires flat on top of each other. The Conti 5000 is shown mounted on a Rolf Carbon Tandem wheel in the second image. To demonstrate the difference, the caliper has been set to the mounted width of the old 4000s tire. All tires were inflated to 95 psi at the time of the photos. The psi and rims will have no effect in the end because the carcass is noticeably narrower than the old 4000s. br>br>The ride is similar to that of the 4000s tires. I'm thinking of removing these from the tandem (heavier bike) and using them on the road bikes. Finally, I may look for alternatives, though finding something with a low rolling resistance and good grip may be difficult. br>br>I believe that the Conti quality remains. Some of you will not notice the difference in width, while others will notice the narrower profile compared to the old 4000s tires.
I've been a long-time Schwalbe fan, especially of the Schwalbe One Clincher in both 25C and 35C. 28C. Despite having had some bad experiences with some gravel kings a few years back, I decided to give the Continental GP 5000's a try after reading a lot of reviews. Back to back on the same bike, wheels, tubes, and pressures, the GP5000 28C's are slightly faster over my well-traveled training routes, and they do feel more "supple" than the GP5000 26C's. The Schwalbe One is one of the most well-known footwear brands in the world. They haven't shown any more/less wear after about 2,000 km of training rides on my usual routes. Cut and nick resistance appears to be better, which is typical of the Ones. After every ride (rarely), I usually wash my tires. During a 135-kilometer ride on Mount Rainier, I had one flat tire. St. Helens, a puncture on a sharp piece of debris, but this was just bad luck, and I believe it would have punctured almost anything. br>br>In terms of handling, they're just as good as, if not better than, the competition. the One. I'm an aggressive descender, and at 190cm and 95kg, I'm pushing the limits of cornering and braking, and I find the GP5000 to be grippy and predictable. I haven't done much riding in the rain with them, but what I have done has been "no drama. " I'm so impressed with these that I've already ordered a second set in 25C for a different set of wheels. This book comes highly recommended.
These tires roll in such a nice way for me. However, in comparison to the GP 4000s, they thinned out the sidewalls, causing a problem that makes the tires unusable for me. Two sidewall blowouts on tires with less than 200 miles on them have happened to me. I assumed the first one was a bad tire, so I replaced it with a new GP 5000, only to have the same problem occur again. Both blowouts happened as the vehicle was braking down a relatively steep hill. I'm around 200 pounds and rely on my front brake to slow down when necessary. My theory is that when the tire and bead collide, strong longitudinal forces are created, causing a rip to form right next to the bead. The tube pops through and a blowout occurs as soon as the rip becomes large enough; it's a terrifying moment when you're speeding down a steep hill at 15 mph. At 20 mph, your tire flattens completely in an instant due to a loud bang. I've been able to safely stop both times this has happened, but I don't want to take the risk a third time. br>br>As far as I can tell, the flat was caused by a design flaw. My Mavic Kysrium SL rim is fine in the area where the rip occurred, and the tire was inflated to 100 pounds. In the past 10000 miles of riding with this rim on a variety of tires, I've never experienced another sidewall tear like this.
The other guy complaining that these are garbage because he can't get them on strikes me as a case of user error. Tubeless tires aren't supposed to be as easy to put on as clincher tires. It took me about 10 minutes to inject the sealant into each tire. Anyway, I've already put about 750 miles on these and have had no issues. There is a noticeable improvement in ride quality over the 4000IIs. The smoother ride quality is the most noticeable difference. On rough roads, being able to run at a lower pressure means more grip and better absorption. For flat tires, I also purchased Stans Race Sealant and Genuine Innovations Tubeless Tire Plugs. I haven't had a flat yet, but I'm ready for it. If you've been debating whether or not to go tubeless, these should put your mind at ease. Conti outdoes himself yet again with a fantastic product!.
Related Products For Continental Grand Prix 5000 Performance Road Bike Tire
