Wolverine Titan 8-in-1 High Resolution Film to Digital Converter with 4.3" Screen and HDMI Output (Black)
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
This was the reason I returned mine. It was just not up to par. Epson flatbed for $200 is orders of magnitude better than any other flatbed for $200
A small amount of memory is available on the internal hard drive. There are approximately 120 megabytes in it. If you want to delete the images after downloading them to your computer, you can use the "Delete all" function.
Undeveloped film cannot be scanned with any device that I know of. Film that is exposed must be developed to produce a photograph that is then
There was a gift included with this, and I am sorry I cannot answer that question.
Selected User Reviews For Wolverine Titan 8-in-1 High Resolution Film to Digital Converter with 4.3" Screen and HDMI Output (Black)
The pros are Controls are easy, quick, and quite easy to use, so it is good for low-tech gadgets The following cons apply to TV viewing as a result of end use The photos on the 35mm negative had a cropped image, grainy result, the white balance varied, it was highly compressed and it wasn't suitable for serious printing or Photoshop planning
Crappy This was the only scanner I could find that had a 20MP sensor instead of an interpolated sensor like the 14/22MP ones. Yet Wolverine negated any benefit of this large sensor by (maybe) sticking with a smaller sensor A grainy scan results from a defective sensor on the end. Dust on the sensor face/screen You cannot easily clean the sensor face/screen, which means your scans could be plagued by dust. * Artifacts of the sensor Halos or "auras" create halos and clouds on dark areas, preventing you from taking photos. You can see photos attached. Printed 35mm (135) Negatives under cropped conditions are as follows When scanned, they are cropped in both the preview and the actual image. They fit just fine and are fully readable in the #2 negative carrier. Having been compressed to death Using 3-bit compression, the JPG files will be smaller It is not uncommon for 5MB files to be downloaded. Artifacts caused by JPG images are disconcerting, especially in areas with continuous colors. Make it possible for Low-income individuals to choose A med-low threat A high quality JPG with a variety of compression levels. There could be a RAW setting in a scanner that is labeled as "Pro" White Balance )***. A number of negatives are automatically corrected by the auto-correct feature I think we had a pretty good balance. A simple set of controls can be tweaked to get a better result. In the case of white balance off A program which allows users to adjust white balance later in software should have an option "White Balance Off. ". A 'Pro' with this feature could easily calibrate a sensor to match what "white" should look like because he knows the "temperature" of the source lamp and can calibrate it accordingly. This feature would be appealing to a great number of.
A lot of people like it because it's My negatives date back to 20 years, so I have plenty of work to do As far as I can tell, everything has been rather fast and efficient The easy way. Negs of 110mm are a little harder to work with than those of 35mm, but that's more a problem with the size of the medium & it's optical properties The scanner itself does not do the scanning. 127 negs are not done yet, but should go as smoothly as the rest.
My only complaint is that the scanner cropped 35mm on the bottom & it seemed like there was some distortion caused by that. They're both right. The sides are easy to fix because the negative can be slid back while the positive is upright As I move forward to improve the composition, it becomes more difficult to get the bottom right. There may be an option to not use the guide. I am scanning photos from grade school to college, so I am not compromising an ansel adams photograph. In any case, it costs As you have paid for it, you get what you have paid for. This is fine with me. A recent update As I was transferring my advantix (aps) negatives with the 110 slide insert, the guides were wildly off for this print By narrowing the channel with toothpicks, I succeeded in narrowing the channel. It seems to work better now than without the negative, but you still have to wiggle it around for it to be visible. You can find the attached photo.
During my search on Google, I came across several reviews that influenced me to buy this. Even though I was a little wary, I decided to try when I read some of the reviews on Amazon. Simply because of how easy it was to use, I rated it 2 stars. The instructions were fairly straightforward, and I believe the set up was nice and straightforward. There was something I didn't like about the print quality. There is a heavy focus on green shades. The levels remain the same even after adjusting them. As a last resort, I tried saving as is and trying to adjust afterward on the computer, but it didn't work. In order to return the item, I made the decision to do so. The Kodak Scanza was ordered after I performed some more research. I'm hoping to have better luck this time. Those who were hoping to take good quality photos would be disappointed with this product.
Work No. 1 of the artisan. In terms of price, there are two basic categories of photo converter A price of $400 or more and a price of The labor or time requirements (yours) to perform the conversion are essentially the same at both pricing levels. The first thing you should do is ask yourself My plans for the conversions are "What will I do with them?"? Then this program IS for you if your answer is "saving memories for my kids and friends". For this service, it works well, and it is much better than anything else available at the same price. There's a BUT. A member of the professional / commercial / artisan community looking for preservation of their work should NOT be looking at this unit. The reasons are as follows There is no edge recognition in the software 1) Using 35mm film gives you an edge even when you're working with it. 4) No corrections are made to dust, specks, scratches, etc. Unless you view the photos in a larger format, such as on a computer monitor, these can be difficult to see. There is no way to save them if you already own them Thus, it is important to check for them regularly. 3) The interface is a bit awkward. 4) The unit cannot be cleaned internally as there is no way to clean it. You should keep your lamp covered while it's not in use if you buy one! 5) The resolution is decent but not outstanding. It only takes about 3 transfers to get to your destination. Each file is 3 MB. There is not much to say about it except that it is really good Although it may be a great unit, it is hardly professional. The time period.
Related Products For Wolverine Titan 8-in-1 High Resolution Film to Digital Converter with 4.3" Screen and HDMI Output (Black)
