CASIO PRIZM FX-CG50 Color Graphing Calculator
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
Unlike TI 84 plus ce, where you must guess, it informs you what the max, min, etc are at a glance instead of guessing like in TI 84 plus ce. It is better than the Ti86 plus CE and very quick to do calculations *br> All high school exams and tests can be taken with it, so I can use it in Australia despite likely being able to buy it cheaper in the USA.
Using this calculator, you can perform both of these types of calculations.
Selected User Reviews For CASIO PRIZM FX-CG50 Color Graphing Calculator
The graphing calculator is comprehensive and features a wide range of functions. Your college math courses will be prepared for, and you will be able to pass them with this book. Starting from your fundamental algebra course, you will move on to differential equations. You will also be able to pass statistics classes with it. So, this calculator is on par with a TI-83 calculator in terms of features The 84 Plus CE is as good as the TI System 84 (if not better in some aspects due to its menu-driven GUI system instead of list-based GUI). In terms of hardware, the CG-2000 comes with Comparing the FX 50 with the TI-50, the FX 50 displays additional screen space, smaller font size, and faster graph rendering speeds. There are 84 Plus CE models. When it comes to cost, it beats out the TI-83 I would rate 84 Plus CE over 84 Plus CE. So, from a performance perspective, features wise, and a price perspective the Casio CG-S100 does well The best way is to use FX 50. Please add P. This guide is for all CG-types From which this calculator was derived, the FX 10 Prism, is a great predecessor. However, it is being overpriced on Amazon as well. This guide is for all CG-types It is obvious to choose the CG-80 over the FX 50 since it is the successor to that calculator It is better to use an FX 50 instead of CG The Foreign Exchange market CGFX has updated their button styling - you don't need to worry about them This was 10 out of 10, which was not The CG-standard's button styling is different from that of the standard A calculator that mirrors most other calculators is the FX 50. You need not worry about this if it doesn't make sense to you or if it doesn't actually matter to you at all. CG is just realizing that there is no such thing as a CG-free game It is also the superior choice to use FX 50.
It is a fantastic calculator that every middle school, high school, and college student should have. The pros are I find it to be so much easier to use than any other Ti-based device The TI XX keystrokes can be learned by following directions in math text books plus additional technical assistance from the teacher)
Cons In general, I would prefer all buttons to be white with a colored lettering rather than black with a colored lettering*Misc As a teacher, I am quite dumbfounded when I hear about students returning Casio models and replacing them with Ti models because the school teachers claim the students aren't qualified to use Casios. I totally see where they're getting it wrong! Since Casio's are so intuitive and easy to use, you do not need an instructor to explain it to you. They are my three eldest kids who all used the Casio FX–100 While in high school and college, they used CG10 computers (calculus, chemistry, physics) and continually noted how much simpler the keystrokes were on their CG10 computers than all of their Ti computers. It is simply the newer version of the CG10 that my fourth son is using, so it's simply the CG50 for him.
However, I had a Casio scientific calculator for high school, and it was great! This is where I get this one now for college algebra and calculus. My TI calculators are noticeably slower, and I find it easier to use than the one in my class. I always have to wait for my TI calculator to finish graphing a problem before I'm allowed to resume class when the professor asks us to graph. However, this is another brand, so there are different instructions on how to use it. Although the interface is somewhat different from TI calculators, it is still similar to the menus and keys of the calculators, such that you become familiar with the layout quickly (I just saw YouTube videos on how to use it, and figured the rest out on my own). In addition, this calculator has many functions that are simpler to use. The calculation of intersects, for example, is much simpler There are additional steps with the TIs, including selecting the curves and spotting the intersection of the curves It just finds it right away with this Casio. The arrows will help you jump from one intersection to the next. There is also the advantage that this calculator is a lot prettier and cheaper than the TI models. Even though it looks weird, I have received a few compliments on how nice it is. Furthermore, the display looks even better than that of Although I may seem like some Casio fan boy or something, I simply wish to share my honest opinion about this calculator because I am so, so pleased with it! When I first chose this calculator, I was worried about using it instead of the recommended one for the class, but now I have no regrets at all.
The device works well for me, has no issues, seems to save battery life, and it is very quick to turn on and off. It uses 4 AAA batteries rather than 4 AA batteries, as the product description states. The fact that it uses four AA batteries isn't a big deal, but I wanted to bring it to the attention of anyone who may have believed it used four AA batteries.
The reason why this is rated 5 stars is that you get a lot of calculator for the money, however, it lacked a few features I find valuable Battery life is poor, there is no touch screen, it is fairly bulky, and I had difficulty finding my way around the menus of various hotkey buttons within the various apps (but that is the downside of having access to all those features everywhere - I can hardly An advantage of having Python is that it can be used for web development Although this calculator does not tie into graphing, etc. , the HP Prime and Numworks are both faster and have similar features, if you are seeking horsepower (but Numworks comes out ahead in speed and has Python as well, although it is significantly less powerful than.
This calculator has many positive qualities, so what are the downsides? In addition to displaying graphs in 3D and color, it offers a variety of other capabilities not found in any of its significantly more expensive competitors There is no reason to spend your money on Texas Instruments when this is half the price and gets the job done just as well! So far, I've only scratched the surface of this calculator's capabilities, but I'm excited to see what else it can offer.