Shure 55SH Series II Iconic Unidyne Dynamic Vocal Microphone, Cardioid Directional Polar Pattern for Live Performances, Shock-Mounted Cartridge, Classic, Vintage Mic with 5/8" to 3/8" Thread Adapter
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
My friend owns the 55SH series 2, while I own the 55 Deluxe. After trying his, I was so enamored with it that I decided to purchase one for myself. I chose the 55 Deluxe because it has a beta 58 capsule rather than an older SM48 capsule, which provides more gain before feedback. The frequency response of 60 Hertz to 17,000 Hertz is also preferable to that of 60 Hertz to 17,000 Hertz. From 50 Hertz to 15,000 Hertz, there is a wide range of frequencies. As a result, it's brighter and reduces the low end, which is something you don't want on a vocal in the first place. However, the sounds of both microphones are distinct, and if you're looking for a more lo-fi sound, you'll want to use one of them. If I were to guess, the 55SH would be a better choice, but if you want something that sounds really good and is more up to date with today's technology, the 55 Deluxe is the way to go.
It does not, in fact. It's a dynamic microphone that doesn't require phantom power to operate. Please consider buying from us (pixelproaudio on Amazon) if this was helpful. We can also assist you with post-purchase support. We have it in stock and can ship it right away. Pixel Pro Audio is an audio production company that specializes in creating
Cords and stands are not included, as they are with any good microphone. My head tilts back perfectly when I use it with a boom stand. I've never used a better mic for live vocals.
The threading and the xlr plug can both fit in the bottom.
Selected User Reviews For Shure 55SH Series II Iconic Unidyne Dynamic Vocal Microphone, Cardioid Directional Polar Pattern for Live Performances, Shock-Mounted Cartridge, Classic, Vintage Mic with 5/8" to 3/8" Thread Adapter
I bought the Super 55 Deluxe for my wife to use in her home studio when she's rehearsing. I decided to correct the situation because she was using a $100 Sennheiser E835 Dynamic Cardioid that she *hated*. The difference in her voice was remarkable with no changes other than plugging in the Shure Super 55, adjusting input trim on the mixer, and some minor EQ. Across the vocal frequency range, there is a very even and consistent response. Some subtle presence enhancement to help vocals stand out in the mix. Another reviewer speculated that the Shure Super 55 might have compression properties - I agree, and I believe it is a good thing. Another thing is that she *loves* the look of the Super 55 Deluxe; she can get right up to the mic, soft or screaming, and it doesn't peg the meter on my board (much). puts her in the mood for the 40s and 50s jazz she excels at: ) In general, We are very pleased with the Super 55 Deluxe, and I will most likely purchase a second one for myself in the near future.
An old-school microphone is always a hit. This one was purchased for a close friend who is a crooner. The beauty of this microphone is that it has an old-fashioned feel to it. school-like appeal, but with a very contemporary sound It has a similar sound to the Shure Beta 58a because it uses the same capsule, which is crisper and more modern sounding than the older SM58 and has a hotter output. So, you can get a modern sound with a nice tight supercardioid pattern by purchasing this classic-looking mic. I was unsure if the cage-like structure would be effective. Although it's unclear whether a basket would muck up the capsule's polar pattern or if internal reflections would be an issue, none of these drawbacks appear to be present in practice. What is there not to like about this?.
I took a chance by dismantling it. My pals believe I'm insane! I purchased this microphone, disassembled it, and powder coated the housing in a bright red color! I then used yellow foam to replace the foam windscreen on the inside. I put it back together and tested it after resoldering the wires inside. This mic has incredible clarity. I took a chance by disassembling it and altering its appearance, but when the band gives this mic to our lead guitarist/vocalist as a gift, he'll go crazy!br>Great mic even /after/ being modified!.
Pros:
- By far one of the most beautiful microphones I've ever had the pleasure of usingbr>- Except for the plastic near the handle, the build quality is excellent. br>- Some performers have said that this mic helped them sound their best, and you could be one of them. br>br>Cons:
- The mids and highs (at least for my voice) were a little harsh. br>- The sound quality of this microphone was poor right out of the box. With this, I needed to do a lot of heavy EQbr>- Because there is no humbucking coil, you may hear EMI through your monitoring headset or speakers if your environment contains a lot of it. br>- Plosives bother her a lot. Even if you use voiceover techniques and/or speak off the cuff, To combat the plosives on the axis, I needed a pop filterbr>br>Overall: Overall, it's difficult to say whether or not this microphone is good. I'm aware that it didn't sound quite 'right' for my voice; my voice is mostly deep, but I wasn't expecting such harsh mids and highs from this mic. It wasn't anything that couldn't be fixed with some EQ, but it was noticeable. Also, despite the difficulty of perfectly bending sheet metal, the curved portions of this mic did have some flaws (such as uneven dents). This mic had a lot of potential for me. However, appearances do not always equate to success. I wanted a mic that sounded great with MY voice (remember, any given mic could sound great with my voice but terrible with someone else's, and vice versa). Despite being about a quarter the price of the Super 55 Deluxe, my Samson Q2U made my voice sound much more pleasant. Again, your voice might be a good fit for this mic. My voice didn't sound very good through this mic.
To be sure, it's a classic, but it has a design flaw that needs to be addressed. If you use an adapter or a shim, you won't be able to plug in an XLR cable into the microphone's base. I wish the jack was just a few millimeters further forward.
Before you buy, familiarize yourself with the features. The Shure 55SH microphone's iconic design is enough to justify its purchase, but it's also worth comparing it to Shure's similar (but much more expensive) "Super 55. " While the 55SH is less expensive and comes with a switch, it lacks the sensitivity of some of Shure's other excellent microphones. You can compensate for this by turning up the gain on your amp or using a PA preamp, and the mic still sounds great, especially in live situations. The highly efficient "super-" With a "cardoid" pickup pattern, monitors can be placed directly in front of the singer without causing feedback. I've been using it in a swing band for a few months now, and we really like the way it looks and sounds when the singers are using it. br>br>The only drawbacks I can think of are: a) we thought we'd like the front switch, but it turns out that the singer can accidentally turn it off (a problem until the singer figures out what went wrong), and b) a singer who prefers to hold the mic in their hand will not like the heavy weight. The first issue was solved by placing a clear plastic guide over the switch plate, which kept the switch in the "on" position. Keep in mind that this microphone is meant to evoke the "good old days," when microphones were large, heavy objects that no one held in their hands. When Elvis was first starting out, he used mics like this, and radio announcers could hide behind them. br>br>Because Shure requires its retailers to adhere to a minimum retail price, finding a bargain on one of these is difficult. We were pleased with the mic's solid brushed chrome construction and performance, and I've already been asked to lend it to friends for special occasions. This one is going to be a keeper! The bottom line is. br>br> There are smaller Shure mics that sound just as good or better, but the Shure 55SH will be your first choice if you want both retro looks and great performance.
" Because it's a Shure, there's no need to worry about sound quality or durability. This does not sound superior to an SM58, but it does have "the look. " Don't be fooled by its size; it's a big chassis that's extremely sensitive to movement. Sing directly into the microphone's CENTER. We struggle with feedback, but this hasn't made things any worse. Brothers, sing out!.