Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Lens, Lens Only
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
The zoom mechanism now uses a rotating ring (like most other Canon zoom lenses) instead of a push/pull system, which is one of the differences from the Mark I version. br>*A new lens hood with a side window is included in the Mark II version, allowing you to adjust specialty filters (such as polarizers and variable neutral density filters) while shooting. density filters) without having to take the hood off. br>*While the lens is mounted to a camera body, the tripod mount can now be removed. Only when the lens is detached can the Mark I tripod mount be removed. br>*Instead of the two modes found on the Mark I, the IS system has three. The third mode, dubbed "Mode 3" by Canon, is similar to the panning mode ("Mode 2") but only applies stabilization during exposure. br>*In comparison to the original, the lens is slightly taller, wider, and heavier. br>*The EF 100-mm f/2.8L IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS IS The focal length is 400mm and the aperture is f/4. With one Fluorite and one Super UD element, the 6L IS II USM employs a completely new optical formula.
This is dependent on the sport, your proximity to the action, and the aperture you desire. I also shoot a lot of action, such as softball, baseball, gymnastics, rowing, and other sports. My camera has accumulated 200 lives. However; If I want to see things from different angles, such as a shot from center field looking down on the batter - I'm going to use the 100-watt bulb. 400 In most rowing events, I also require it for the reach. Having said that, I still prefer the 70-minute version. For speed and sharpness, give it a score of 200. Maybe it's because I'm more at ease with that particular lens.
100- Indoor shots require a shutter speed of 400. At my son's soccer game recently, I took photos. Even with a 70-degree angle, it's possible to get a good result 200 2. 8 To get fast enough shutter speeds to capture the movements, I had to increase the ISO to 6400. I took a lot of good pictures, but they were all grainy. 2. in terms of actions The only option is to go with number eight.
No, because you'll be using this lens/TC combination at f/11, you'll have to manually focus with the 2x TC. br>The new 100-page book is a must-read for anyone who enjoys reading. The 1. is taken care of by the 400mm II. The 4x TC works well with my 7D mkII and 5D mkIII, but you can only use the center focus point at f/8 because you're at f/8.
Selected User Reviews For Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Lens, Lens Only
I'm guessing it's a thousand shots. Insects, flowers, birds, and landscapes are all examples of this. It's my "walk around lens," which I use on a Canon 7D mark II. My copy had a back focus issue at 100mm right out of the box, but that was easily fixed with a quick micro adjustment (-). 10). It was difficult for me to adjust to the extra 100mm from my EF 70-200mm lens because I shoot hand-held. 300L f/4- 6 IS USM. I was pleasantly surprised at how little that extra 100mm provided. I'm not sure what I was expecting, but it exceeded my expectations, LOL. With the 100-megapixel camera, I have to be very careful to avoid camera shake. Because, as we all know, the longer your focal length, the more shake you'll get. Now, this lens's IS is a genuine four-stop system. I've taken photos with a single room light bulb, hand held, at 1/10 second, and they're as sharp as they can be. Shooting in cluttered areas, such as tree leaves, is a challenge for me. The EF 70-200mm f/2. 8L IS II USM wants to hunt a little more than I'd like. In these situations, the 300L locked on with no issues. I use the 7D2's first AF spot, which is a square within a square, to pin point a focus spot through the leaves and branches. I understand that auto focus is mostly done in camera, and the 7D2 is incredible, but there's something about this lens that causes it to hunt in these few situations. I have the lens' autofocus set to 3m to infinity, which helps but does not solve the problem. 90 of the time, even in clutter, it locks on instantaneously. Low light, I believe, is the root of the problem. It simply motivates me to take as many pictures as possible until the subject moves on. I will get 100% others I will get 60% (I am used to%) with the 7D2 and the EF 70- 300L. I'm not a fool, so I'm aware that camera shake is a factor; another issue I'm adjusting to, but it's a good one, is locating my target when zoomed to 400mm. br>Now here's what I don't understand. All of the reviews claim that the zoom ring's twist is too long. That doesn't make sense to me because I have small hands and fingers. I can go from 100mm to 400mm in a flash with a single twist, and it's not at all awkward. I'm not sure if these people have ever used this lens or if their technique is incorrect. I'm not sure what you're talking about. br>br>EDIT: Even at 400mm, this lens is capable of focusing to 3 feet. You must be aware of your DOF or you will mistakenly believe you are having focusing issues. Check out a video from a guy who tried out this lens in the Galapagos Islands on YouTube. The lens's ability to focus close to the subject is what drew me in. br>br>I understand that the images posted aren't exactly accurate representations of the lens, but you might be able to learn something from them: br>1) Hummingbird at 30 feet; br>2) Hummingbird at 30 feet; br>3) Hummingbird at At a height of 200 feet, Roseate Spoonbills can be seen. At 6 feet (400mm), the lizard is a formidable opponent. At a height of 100 feet, a gull; At 4 feet (400mm), the skipper; At a height of 5 feet (400mm), there is a flower and a bee. At 50 feet, a Pileated Woodpecker can be seen. A shot of the moon, as is customary: )br>br>These are all CROPPED shots. br>br>5/26/2019 EDIT: This lens appears to be in good condition. That is why I bring it up because I am known for not looking after my belongings and being a little rough. You'd think so, but I'm not your typical user. It's been thrown, smashed, and taken out in the rain, fog, heat, and cold. Do you see what I mean? I do it all the time, LOL. Added some raptor shots on 8/24/2019. All of the images have been zoomed/cropped to a size between 50 and 100 percent. 75% and at a minute per minute per minute per minute per 200 feet above the ground level.
Worth it? You bet! To begin, let me state that a $1700 purchase is not chump change for me, and I had to sell several pieces of equipment to make it work. br>br>This lens will take the place of a 70-mm lens. 200mm f/4L (non-aperture) IS) and a non-IS 300mm f/4L (non-IS). Yes, it is a 1992 model). I needed a camera with a long range and excellent image stabilization. I rented the Mark I, push-button camera about 6 years ago. I pulled a version of this lens so I could cover Obama's arrival in San Francisco on Air Force One for a website I'm working on. The reach was impressive, but the images were a little soft in comparison to other excellent L glass I've owned and used. br>br>I debated for a long time whether I should get this lens or the 70-200mm. f/2 at 200mm The 8L IS Mark II is the second generation of the 8L IS. I ended up with this lens after trying out the 4x III. I didn't want to use a teleconverter for a variety of reasons. Plus, I knew I'd be shooting at 400mm a lot, and the 1. suffers from a slight quality loss. 4x III on the 70-yard dash 200, as opposed to the new 100. 400L. br>br>I purchased this used to save a few hundred dollars - I'd recommend it to others if the website, like Amazon, has a return policy for third-party vendors. br>br>Here are some of the things I like:br>br>1) The image quality is excellent. From 100- Contrast and color are rendered superbly throughout the entire range of 400. 2) The sharpness of the image is excellent. Even at 400mm and wide open, the image quality is top-notch. The wide open performance has completely blown me away. br>br>3) Image stabilization is fantastic, and for 400mm hand-held shots, it's a must. I am confident that it is as good as advertised down to four stops, as I am able to get sharp images three out of four times at 1/10sec and almost every time at 1/20sec for a stationary object at 400mm. To be the most effective with the stabilization, become familiar with the various modes and how they work. br>br>4) The ability to work at a macro level. You can focus down to about 3 feet (1 meter), so you can get some great up-close shots. photographs taken up close and personal 5) Bokeh (br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br The separation and bokeh quality are fantastic. br>br>Things that irritate me: 1) The tripod collar foot (br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>b Getting on and off is difficult. When it was stuck, I even chipped the paint while attempting to remove it. Since then, I've learned not to take things too seriously. the wheel should be tightened br>br>2) The amount of weight. When I bought this beast, I was fully aware of what I was getting myself into. Make sure your strap is in good condition. The Black Rapid RS-II is the model that I use. 7, which has made a significant difference in the health of my shoulders and neck. 3) Lens creep (br>br> The zoom's locking mechanism is adequate but not perfect, and it's inconvenient to use, so I don't use it half the time, and the lens creeps anyway. I suppose it's both my and Canon's faults: mine for not using it, and theirs for not making it more user-friendly. br>br>Overall, this is an incredible lens. There are few things that can match the pure image quality and versatility of a DSLR camera. Yes, it is pricey. Worth it? You bet!.
The second version of the 400mm lens I primarily photograph wildlife and have traveled to Africa twice with a Nikon D3200. But, with a trip planned for September, I knew I needed to step up my game. I finally decided between the 80D and the 7D mark ii, opting for the 80D due to its newer features and higher image quality. I also bought a Canon 100-megapixel camera. The perfect safari combination is completed with a 400mm ii lens. Then, a few days ago, I took my camera and lens to the Los Angeles Zoo and was astounded by the image quality! In a single word, incredible! Take a look at them. Both photos were taken with a 400mm lens and are incredibly sharp!.
I finally upgraded from the original, and "upgrade" doesn't even come close to describing how much better it is. There are two times of day. Even when the camera is wide open, the images are razor sharp. The 4- IS comes to a halt. Built like a tank, it focuses extremely quickly, and the shooting experience (not just the IQ) changes as well. The locking hood alone was a huge improvement for me as a wildlife photographer who spends his weekends literally climbing through the woods. When paired with a high-end wine, it's a match made in heaven. This lens is a beast on a performance camera like the 7D mkii. br>br>Previously, I was using a 70D with the original 100-400mm lens. 400 It wasn't a bad combination, and I got some good shots (which I'll keep as a backup), but this lens (paired with the 7D) completely transformed my photography experience. This is a year I'm looking forward to.
Related Products For Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM Lens, Lens Only
