Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras, White - 3044C002
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
Yes, it comes with that little leg in the photo, as well as a ring to adjust the position around the lens and a standard screw to attach it to a tripod.
If you purchase a Canon EF/EOS M lens adapter, it will be compatible. Because the sensor is smaller, the lens is designed for a full-frame camera, so there will be a virtual increase in telephoto effect. sensor of the frame
Yes, it will work with your camera. Remember to divide the focal length by one. Your sensor is cropped, so you get a 6. As a result, the total length will be 112 inches. 320mm on a Rebel T7br>Regular length (70-100mm) Only full-priced items (i.e., $200) are available. cameras with frames This is a fantastic lens!
Yes, that is correct. Some dealers claim to be able to sell it without a warranty for a lower price, claiming that it is a lower-cost version. They'll then try to upsell you to a higher-end version with a longer warranty. That is not a good way to buy a lens. You're taking a big chance by doing this. Stick to reputable dealers and invest in a full-featured vehicle. product with a guarantee
Selected User Reviews For Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras, White - 3044C002
I've had the Mark II for eight years and must admit that the improvements are minor. I gave it a shot and failed miserably. I couldn't swear I noticed a difference in my living room after just one comparison. Tonight, I used it to photograph a rock band at a local venue- a significant challenge-- I thought it was fantastic. Despite shooting at ISO 3200 to 6400 (on a Canon 5D Mk IV), the photos came out looking great, crisp and clear. The autofocus system had stopped working. WITH THE EXCEPTION of when I accidentally pushed the Auto- I used the manual switch to turn it off. I did it a few times throughout the night. Is that a flaw in the lens or just a mistake on my part? I've never had this issue with the Mk II, but I have with my 24-inch monitor. 70 and had to use tape to hold the switch in place. I only bring it up so that others are aware of the danger. For the time being, I'm going to chalk it up to Operator Error rather than the lens. The handling of lens flare was said to be one of the improvements over the Mark II. Canon was probably thinking of glare from the sun, but for me, it's stage backlighting shining directly into my lens. It dealt with it admirably. Throughout the night, I don't believe I saw a single lens flare; At the very least, it's not obtrusive. What else is there to say? It's very similar to the Mark II in terms of feel. Controls, balance, and weight are all the same. The image stabilization is said to be the same, and I couldn't tell the difference. You could certainly make the case that upgrading isn't worth the money. Overall, I'm impressed with the new lens, and I'm glad I replaced my old, aging, and battleworn one.
br>Compression, image quality, CA, sharpness, and contrast - these are all important factors to consider. Everything is correct. It's well-made, balanced, and feels solid. It has a nicer "whiter" finish than its predecessor, accepts a 77mm filter, and comes with a lens hood (as I believe all lenses should) - Did I mention that this thing produces some seriously crisp photos? br>br>I dabble in portraiture, but I'm much more into nightscape/landscape photography, and believe me when I say this lens is now used more than the 24-70mm. 70mm or 85mm is a good choice. Simply put, if you have the extra cash and want a great telephoto lens, get this lens. You'll be glad you did. You deserve a pat on the back for making a wise investment. If you really want to see if it's worth it before buying one, rent one for a weekend and just have fun with it. You'll want to purchase your own as soon as you return it. br>br>I have no regrets about spending a few thousand dollars on such a substantial piece of glass.
After purchasing the version without image stabilization, I recently purchased this. I thought the savings would be worth it, but at least half of the photos I took were too blurry, so it ended up in my bag. I decided to upgrade to this lens, and I'm glad I did. I recently photographed a concert that had poor lighting. The performance of this lens was outstanding. Almost all of my photos were razor sharp, and I was able to get some incredible close-ups with the bokeh. The extra money spent on image stabilization was well spent. I only wish I had purchased it first and bypassed the 70-minute wait. Without the IS, the score is 200.
You are going to be sorry. br>Focusing was terrible, and the open part was broken; every time I tried, my photos became smeared. So I returned it, but they only gave me a partial refund, as follows: 402$. br>What are you talking about, man? Buying a loan on Amazon is not a good idea.
Between the flowers and the background, the Depth of Field is incredible. br>When compared to my other non-L Series lenses, the focusing speed is incredible. These are some of the reasons why Canon photographers prefer L series lenses. If you're serious about your photography, you'll want to get this lens. This lens is perfect for portraits and sports photography.
You will not be disappointed when you open the box if you can persuade yourself to put this in your cart and click the buy button. It's massive, heavy, and incredibly seductive. If you already own the Mark II version of this lens, you won't need this one, according to YouTube reviews. But since I didn't have any version of this lens before, I'm blown away.
After using my older EF 70-200mm lens for a while, I decided to try something new. 200mm 1: After years of using the 8 L IS USM, I began to notice that my images were softer than those captured with my other (newer) Canon lenses. While the results were better after cleaning and recalibration, I realized it was probably time to replace it with the most recent version. br>br>The new Canon EF 70-200mm f/2. 8L IS II IS II IS II IS II IS II IS II IS II IS II IS II f/2 at 200mm The 8L IS III USM Lens is a little lighter and a lot sharper than the 8L IS III USM Lens. I just got back from a nature shoot out of state where I used this lens a lot, mostly at 200mm, while hand holding it. The images are all razor sharp, with great color and detail. br>br>The 70-year-old man My 'go-to' number is always 200. 'to' lens in a variety of situations. I like having the option of using lovely bokeh backgrounds or excellent depth of field depending on the situation and the results I'm after. This is an excellent lens, and despite the fact that it is a little pricey, it has already proven to be a professional tool that does exactly what it should. br>br>I'm in love with my new Canon EF 70-200mm lens. f/2 at 200mm I'm glad I didn't go for a cheaper competitor's product instead of the 8L IS III USM Lens.
Despite the fact that my package arrived a little battered, I believe the product is satisfactory.
Related Products For Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras, White - 3044C002
