Comtrend G.hn Powerline 1200Mbps Ethernet Over Coaxial Kit I Enhanced Streaming and Gaming I 2 Unit Kit (GCA-6000KIT)

Don't waste your time and money on it. In this case, 0 if you have dark or dedicated coaxial cable. Gigabit Ethernet wire terminates at our basement utility panel at the first floor router which I recently wired with Cat 5E for the first floor network infrastructure at our house. This was done in order to replace the MOCA 1 network with four new ones. In the past 15 years, I have used 0 Motorola NIM100s. In recent weeks, my kids complained that the network speed had slowed down while streaming video or playing games, so it was time to upgrade the related wired and wireless infrastructure as well as my internet It has an addendum with the foundations separated by a stairway, so I can't drill and snake a line to that part of the house. There was almost no choice given that the addition has the kids' rec room AND the family room above where there is a LOT of network activity (Xbox, Switch, PC, WiFi routers, video streaming, etc. ) Due to the limited bandwidth and the existing RG-type connection. A set of bonded MOCA 2 is on my shopping list. I was planning to buy 6 coaxes. I was intrigued by the 0 adapters, but turned them down due to the cost.
When the addition was built, they ran two (RG-6) There are six coaxial cables that connect the A/V center in the family room to the utility panel on the other side of the foundation. It's never made sense to me why they do it. With only one feed needed, the other has been dark for the last 20 years that we have I just happened to stumble upon these units as I was looking around for other options. Due to the fact that I had a dark coaxial cable leading to my house and I could isolate them from the rest of the FiOS signal, I decided to test them out. It is critical that this point be addressed The coax cable that currently carries cable TV signals cannot be used with these. The dark RG-S is in my case The length of a coaxial cable is probably between 10' and 15' My cables are about 15' long, so I was confident that I would be able to get maximum bandwidth out of these devices, especially given the other comments here that mention speeds with cables substantially longer.
Like MOCA (and WiFi), these units also run on half the power A duplex system. It means that the whole bandwidth is available to both devices on the link, but only one may transmit at a time. has a maximum throughput of 400Mbps if you use only two adapters ("Turbo" mode where it will significantly cut down the overhead and use this for additional data transmission) but as soon as you add a third adapter it goes back to 400Mbps. (Bonded MOCA aggregates data across two channels to achieve 1 Gbps speed, doubling the speed effectively. The only drawback is that it causes an increase in delays because data on these independent channels must be queued and resent Before leaving a port, the data must be ordered properly. Therefore, the data must be bonded with With 0 you will get more speed, but at the cost of delay (a critical factor for gaming and streaming) and at a greater price. It is not inadequate in any way, but it has its own set of trade-offs. It is off. I congratulate the GCA for its first quarterly report While 6000s use a single 1200Mbps channel, it is spread across multiple channels. The result is a significant reduction in delay. As well as using channels at twice the "effective" data rate, MOCA uses 2x the channel. In the same way as MOCA, more than two units can be used to form a There are no complicated setups with these they work plug and play. If you want a different IP address assigned, you can do so, however that is not A Comtrend spokesperson claims the maximum data upload speed can reach With this setup, I was able to access my 1Gbps backbone at the effective rates I was able to achieve using a freeware application called "LANbench. ". In the attached screen grabs, I have taken all measurements using my office PC, which then connects with my main router (Netgear R6220), which also uses a GCA-based antenna system. A short RG with 6000s should be a good option The 6 cable will go to the 8 cable In the family room, there's a Netgear switch with 4 ports that links directly to the 5 port switch in the rec room when the kids' gaming PC is in place.

As part of the testing, I took screen grabs to display both the current and the actual rate. As a result of using only TX or RX when I am operating in unidirectional mode, I consistently achieve throughput rates of just over 650Mbps "average," with peak speeds of about 30Mbps. This is a 40Mbps increase. There was one case when I obtained a peak speed of When you look at these rates in full duplex, you can see they are half, but combined are quite close to half. There are two speed levels. For what we use it for, it is plenty of speed. I recently switched to FiOS 200/200, which measures consistently between 300/300 and 400/450! A version of G used in these units is an early one. In the near future, however, equipment will be available that will offer up to 1Gbps (or more) of My current units offer all the speed I need for our needs, so I would not upgrade. MOCA 2 was almost 2x as expensive for me, so there was no sense in paying almost twice as much. In actuality, I would never be able to take advantage of 0 thanks to higher latency and only providing *250Mbps of additional throughput. The bandwidth I have available on my network is not sufficient for me to regularly transfer TBs of files, or to use In MOCA 2, there are two bonded works. In the absence of dark or isolated coax, 0 adapters are still a great option for those without cabling. I would have done this myself if I had not had dark coax However, if these are healthy and will work for you, you can save some money by purchasing them.

Aleah Hodges

| Nov 07, 2020

There is 497mbps of data transfer between these two devices within my network. I did not have a lot of trouble with installation. To make the coaxial spaghetti in the basement, I rerouted it so that it basically runs straight from one Other than these two things, there are no other signals on the coax. As it turned out, I didn't want to mess with running a Cat6 cable through my apartment or dealing with redoing the drywall and stuff. My score is 500, which I am happy with. I think it is a good bit of speed for the compromise of not having to deal with wiring. If something changes, I will update this review. For now, I would say I like it. The engineer has approved it. The following updates have been made Having kept these things in place for 1 year, I can tell you that they have been quite successful. Instability and packet loss is not an issue. As an added bonus, I also shortened the distance between the two and upgraded the switch at the other end of the line to reduce the signal cancellation. Now that I've broken 500 and am in the upper threshold for speed, I am sometimes at 540 or 550. The maximum theoretical rate for the technology is 1200Mbps if all goes perfectly. You're more likely to be offered between 300 and 400Mbps instead. A 600mbps connection. It might be possible to achieve 1200mbps on dual band, but this is not the case. The cost is also half as much. Because I stream Steam from my gaming desktop to other areas of my house, either through AC WiFi or the Steam Link, I was most interested in minimizing latency and ensuring steady, reliable packet delivery. The system is flawless in this regard.

Gianni Shepard

| Mar 03, 2021

An update after one and a half years. This equipment appears to be capable of achieving a maximum data transfer speed of 500 Mbps, but still in a point-to-multipoint configuration This is the best case scenario (read the best case). In my case, it works just fine, but your mileage may vary. There's no limit to the maximum, so the Mbps advertised is the total throughput. Theoretically, you can achieve 1200 Mbps simultaneously across at least four units (if you deploy at least four of them in your home coax infrastructure). In a real environment you would see a lot lower than that, as that is raw throughput in an ideal environment. Due to the fact that I do not have the four units deployed as such, I am unable to confirm the throughput It would be my hope that, in that scenario, a total throughput would be higher than 600 Below you will find my original review. As far as my use case is concerned, this has been quite useful. The house already has an isolated coax cable run (as part of a former dish setup that I no longer use), which provides data at 1Gbps from one end to the other. The speed is 100+ Mbps. I have not tested throughput, but I confirmed I get that speed. With my LAN plugged into an unmanaged switch feeding a wireless access point, I was able to run multiple lag-free tests When you connect a phone to a WAP router, you get 200+ Mbps reading out of the phone while watching HD streams. The installation was too simple and plug and play for me, as my use case. It was for this reason that I tested out the system with a shorter coax cable confined to my desk to make sure they worked and were not faulty. Apparently, the IP address of the units was hard coded to 192 by default. There seems to be no difference in my 192 between 5 and 6. X subnet is available for use. As for specific cases, I can't predict what will happen, but as a general guideline 1*
Support your state/province. These should work fine if you run them on X subnet is available for use. It will be necessary for you to resolve IP conflict if there is one. ** 1. Use the "coax network" built into the structure of your home at your own risk. Whether you can use this is dependent on the quality and complexity of the network, as well as the types, qualities, and number of splitters and filters used throughout, etc. Please keep in mind that you can only use these if you do not have cable internet and/or If you are using a coax network, ensure that the frequencies currently being utilized do not fall within the range of frequencies The Ethernet over coax specification hn. So I could've also gotten and used MoCA for my use case, which for my purposes seems to be a more intuitive and expandable option (e. g. Later, I could plug it into my coax network so it would coexist with cable internet. In this case, I chose G to try it out. The cheapest MoCA bonded 2 costs about $30 more, whereas this uses the same technology and saves about $30. My search for a Motorola pair turned up nothing. It is only one annoyance I wish to mention (but will not take off a star for), is that it claims to provide There is no way to upgrade the units since they come with built-in 1000 Mbps or Gigabit Ethernet ports. No switch I know can upgrade the unit to speed above The two modules may be able to speed up data transmission once they are in the unit and send to the other one. As for the other end that connects to a switch, it will also be negotiated down to 1000 Mbps. I agree, even in theory, 1200 Mb/s is impossible!.

Musa Clay

| Jun 27, 2021