Fossil Men's Grant Stainless Steel Quartz Chronograph Watch
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
The dimensions of the bad are 22mm.
Although the Fossil Grant is a men's watch, we think it looks fantastic on women as well.
Yes sir. It appeals to me. Exceptionally elegant
It's a standard men's leather wristband that should fit most people. If I were a professional football tackle, I'd probably require a larger band.
Selected User Reviews For Fossil Men's Grant Stainless Steel Quartz Chronograph Watch
This is not an authentic Fossil timepiece! If you look closely at the photo (which I obviously didn't), you'll notice that the Roman numeral 4 (which should be IV) and the 9 (which shows IV but should be IX) are incorrect. I'm so disappointed because the watch is lovely, and the price is reasonable, but no price is good enough for this timepiece. I'll be returning this tomorrow!.
This is a lovely watch, but it's a lousy timepiece. It was 1 minute fast on the first day, 2 minutes fast on the second day, and 3 minutes slow on the third day, all within 12 hours. I just had to tell you how much I adored this timepiece! It's a lovely watch to look at, but I'm looking for a watch, not a bracelet. There have been a lot of positive reviews, so I could have just gotten a bad one, but I'm not sure if this is a quartz watch as described. When you buy something, you're taking a chance.
It's not damaged, as some have claimed, and the box was undamaged, but seriously, it's not a big deal if it falls out. It looks fantastic! Was already on time, on the dot, and on the money.
$89 is a waste. First and foremost, let me state that I adore the design of this watch, so much so that I purchased the gold link chain to go with it. The quality of the finish, the history, and the movement, on the other hand, are what make me want to wear and love a watch. Given that this is a fashion watch, I didn't expect much in the way of those features, but I was so taken with the design that I decided the trade-off was worth it. I really want the trade-off to be worthwhile, but after a few days of wearing it, I'm just not sure. It's clear that it's a low-cost timepiece. The watch is currently listed for $89. br>br>As I write this, it is listed for $89. However, I paid $149 for the watch and chose the gold metal link strap to go with it when I bought it. That puts the price of this watch at $200, and it's unclear whether it's worth the money. First and foremost, charging $50 for a band is ridiculous; my $36 Casio has a better band. br>br>Second, even if I paid $89 for this watch, I would be disappointed. Almost every other non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop non-stop At a price point of $100 or less, a fashion watch brand (Seiko, Citizen, Casio, etc. ) In addition, if you're like me and willing to spend $200 on a piece of horological history, you can get a truly stunning timepiece. If you're new to watches, I'd recommend watching a few videos on YouTube about watches under $200 (or in that range) before deciding whether or not to buy a fashion watch. I don't think it's worth it for me. However, if you like the design and don't mind a mediocre finish, the watch could be a good fit for you.
The messed up Roman numeral 4 has led to a number of reviews claiming that this is not an original fossil. This exact watch, with the incorrect number 4 and all, can be found on the Fossils website. I believe this is the reason for the low price; the watch has a nice heft to it. The lines are very clean and classic, and the overall appearance is fantastic. It has a larger frame than most watches, but it isn't overpowering. The only minor flaw is the chronograph's small size. This would not have been an issue five years ago, but I will be unable to use it without magnification now. It would have been great if it had been included in the crystal. This watch has made me very happy.
The design is lovely, and it fits my husband's wrist perfectly. The blue adds a touch of personality and style to an otherwise stunning design. There were no issues with the packaging, and I really like the Christmas gift box/tin it came in. I would strongly advise anyone to purchase this watch.
When it comes to timekeeping precision and durability, I'd put Fossil right up there with Timex. I mean it as a compliment. It's not particularly expensive, but it's very useful. I'm a watch addict, and despite owning several silver-toned timepieces, I'm still looking for a new one. I've always admired gold-toned watches with blue faces, and I'd always wished for one. This watch's photo, on the other hand, isn't entirely accurate. This watch's face is such a deep, dark blue that it appears to be black. I even double-checked the product tag to make sure Fossil hadn't sent me a black-faced watch instead of a blue one (which they hadn't). So I guess it's up to you to decide whether or not to buy this watch; if you like the style and don't mind wearing what appears to be a black-faced watch, there should be no problem. However, I would recommend looking elsewhere if you want a wrist watch that looks as blue as the one shown in the photo.
It's only been on my body for one day (it was delivered this morning). It's well-made and will look great with both casual and formal attire. The blue and gold color scheme is very appealing, and the brown leather band is of excellent quality. The buckle has many small holes that should be easy to fit to anyone's wrist. br>br>It was simple to set the time to the correct local time; I doubt I'll use the chronograph feature, but it does work. br>br>Overall, it's a fantastic everyday watch.
Related Products For Fossil Men's Grant Stainless Steel Quartz Chronograph Watch
