Pampers Easy Ups Training Underwear Boys Size 5 3T-4T 22 Count (Packaging May Vary)

Pampers Easy Ups Training Underwear Boys Size 5 3T-4T 22 Count (Packaging May Vary)

Name: Pampers Easy Ups Training Underwear Boys Size 5 3T-4T 22 Count (Packaging May Vary)
Brand: Pampers
SKU: 1164054
Price: 9.29 USD
Rating: 9.43 (773 reviews)

$ 9.29

Score By Feature

Based on 773 ratings

Stretch

9.58

Maneuverability

9.48

For potty training

9.12

Absorbency

8.88

Leak protection

6.66

OveReview Final Score

How Our Score Is Calculated

Product Description

360o Stretchy Waist Band - the perfect solution to your toddler's underwear need as this is something they can pull up and down easily

Extra Absorb Channels provide powerful leak protection while you sleep and while you are awake

Keeping leaks where they occur is easy with a dual leak guard barrier

Sides that are easy to tear for lightning-fast changes and a

This material is super soft, like wearing underwear made of cotton

The superhero designs that come with PJ Masks take potty training to the next level

There may be some changes to packaging & product designs

Questions & Answers

Does a girl have the option to wear PJ Mask pull ups or are they only designed for males?

She will certainly enjoy them if she is a PJ Mask fan, mostly you will find Gecko and Catboy, but there is also Owlette in the pull up!

Selected User Reviews For Pampers Easy Ups Training Underwear Boys Size 5 3T-4T 22 Count (Packaging May Vary)

Unlike the pictures, Thomas did not pull up like that

3/5

It makes no sense to give these two stars because the picture clearly shows that these are the Thomas pull ups and that is the only reason why I purchased them Reading the description further, it appears PJ Masks is associated with the pull ups, but if that is the case, Thomas should not appear as the “current” character, at least not in that first image.

Sydney Ayala

| Jan 21, 2021

For children who have special needs, this is a great product

5/5

It is great to have these products available for us. It's important to us that our son uses them in order to meet his special needs. Accidents on public transportation are a thing of the past for us. As well as him, he believes it to be underwear. In order to learn more about potty training, he tries it more often.

Madalyn Petersen

| Jul 13, 2021

The diaper looks more like a fancy tampon

3/5

There are some very cute designs on these. They are very soft, so I like that. I found them to be good. Potty training pull ups are more like fancy diapers than they are like pull ups. I've tried to use one of these overnight on my son many times but it has always By the next morning, he was soaked to the skin. Despite his pajamas being soaked through, he is still shivering. To make things worse, I have tried not giving him any liquids before bedtime. I have the same problem. Pull-ups are what I will do as long as they are comfortable.

Denisse Sexton

| Aug 06, 2020

Thomas is nowhere to be found! I ordered this item from this seller hoping to receive Thomas Easy Ups instead we received Pj mask, which is alright, but I expected Thomas that is why I ordered it here

3/5

To ensure the picture matches the description, they should change it.

Kenneth York

| May 20, 2021

Images and descriptions that give the wrong impression

3/5

Thomas the Train is shown in the picture however, PJ Masks is described on page 2. Thomas the Train won't be available if you are searching for We have notified a Customer Service Agent, and we hope to make an edit as soon as possible.

Gia Bradshaw

| Jul 17, 2021

Underwear is just like that

5/5

I really like these! They have an elastic waist band that feels like underwear. The pull-up bar is easy to use.

Ian Brandt

| Mar 15, 2021

It has good absorption properties, but it smells bad! I find the pads to be incredibly absorbent, but they don't mask any urine smell

4/5

This is what we use instead of huggies pull-ups Ups have better fitting thighs because my two year old's are chunky.

Belle Farrell

| Feb 23, 2021

There is not enough coverage of the butts

3/5

James Gardner

| Jun 13, 2021