BALEAF Men's Performance Boxer Briefs 9" Athletic Underwear Long Leg Cool Dry with Fly 2-Pack

Pay close attention to the product description provided by the manufacturer - Order one size larger than you normally would for US sizes! To give you an idea of my size, I'm 6'1" tall with a lot of quads and usually wear a US size Large. The XL size of the Baleaf was just right for me. br>br>I attempted to replace my old (circa. 2013) UA 9" original boxerjocks, which UA recently decided to replace with much weaker waistbands. The fit was true to the manufacturer's specifications, the length was comparable to the UA 9", and the leg material compression was adequate. The waistband is a little looser than the old UA pairs, but they didn't fall down. Small air holes in the pouch and the inseam panel allow your bits to breathe well. br>br>The seam pattern is the biggest difference I noticed between these and other brands of long leg boxer briefs. Instead of the back inseam stitching coming up across your cheeks, these have a stitch that starts in the middle of the front leg and wraps around the outside to attach at the waistband at the back, almost an inch in from the widest point. br>br>I've included photos of these in comparison to the UA original 9" boxerjock from 2013. The inseam and pouch both have different seam patterns and materials. Also, while the XL size is slightly larger than the Large UA pair, I believe a Baleaf size Large is too small. PROS: br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>br>
- Longer legs will appreciate the length of this item. br>- Reasonable rise; doesn't feel like the waist should be pulled up to your belly button. br>- Has a keyhole fly that opens (it should be illegal to sell compression shorts that don't have a fly as "underwear"! )
- Low-key and smooth The fabric has a friction feel to it, though it is not as smooth as other brands. br>- Mesh that allows air to pass through. br>- inseam and pouch style materialbr>- Compression is good. br>br>br>br>br>br>style fit br>br>PROs: *Seems* to be a good manufacturing job (although I haven't worn them for very long, so I'm not sure how durable they are)br>br>CONs:
- Waistband is a little flimsier than on older UAsbr>- Limited color selectionbr>br>I've tried the following products to replace my older 9" UA original boxerjocks:
-  .

Jude Stephenson

| Dec 24, 2020

Ever since Under Armour changed the design and fit of the "original" 9in boxerjock, I've been looking for the perfect replacement. The UA Cupron 9in came incredibly close, but UA decided to discontinue them in favor of the "microthread," which is a sham. My initial gripe with UA's new boxerjock and microthread was that the legs were too tight while the waist was loose and low-cut. rising. I don't like having my crack exposed every time I bend, so I prefer my underwear to sit at my waist. I'm a bigger guy (6'1, 250, 38 waist) who is somewhat active, so I've tried a few different brands of underwear recently and have yet to find the perfect pair, until now. So far, the Baleaf fits perfectly, stays in place, has plenty of room in the manparts, and the waistband stays in place without bending and actually sits on my waist; the legs are snug but not too tight, and there has been no ride-up. The only issue will be longevity, which will come with time; however, as long as these underwear last, I've finally found the perfect pair of underwear for me.

Nico AHMED

| Sep 30, 2021

I'm 5'10" and 180 pounds, and I usually wear a medium. On me, these were too big, and the waistline was too high. In addition, the pouch was far too large. Perhaps sizing down would be better, but I also ordered the Tesla brand in a small as recommended and they fit perfectly and the waist rode lower than I prefer. As a result, we decided not to pursue the Baleaf brand any further. br>br>EDIT: I have to say that this company is fantastic; they contacted me and sent me a smaller pair. I really wanted to like them, but I couldn't stand them. It all depends on your build and how you like your waist to ride. Thank you Baleaf for your outstanding customer service, which has prompted me to order additional products.

Edward James

| Dec 23, 2020

I'm particular about how I house my boys, as are most men I know. My expectations for this brand and style were met, if not exceeded. Little Richard can't peek out the front door without Palmela's help, so it's a perfect fit. I'll be back to see what else you have to offer.

Journey Guerrero

| Sep 07, 2021

They appear to be good when received, and I'm looking forward to trying them out. br>br>When you first put them on, you'll notice that the outer material is nice and light, but the liner inside is very loose. There isn't much in the way of support, and it feels like there's a lot of "play" going on. Running in them, as expected, causes things to move around and is a bit of a distraction. I lost track of this issue after a few miles, but I still have the same uneasy feeling after each use. I'm thinking about removing the entire liner and replacing it with a pair of compression shorts. br>br>It would be nice to have a more supportive inner liner, but the price is still reasonable.

Aniyah Jennings

| Aug 30, 2021

I became a double amputee a year ago, and the smoothness of this product allows me to move around in and out of my wheelchair without using the transfer board. The fly is necessary for me to be able to use the restroom while sitting in my chair. The 3X size is perfect for me because I am a big guy.

Blair Holloway

| Jul 14, 2021

The fabric irritates my skin. They're cut incorrectly, giving them a twisted sensation. The hem stitch feels like a spool of 10 pound test fishing line and digs into your skin. They're also far too small, with little to no stretch. I'm baffled as to how people get away with producing such garbage.

Cadence Reynolds

| Aug 29, 2021