Band-in-a-Box 2019 Pro for Windows [Old Version]

My experience with Amazon makes me rarely enraged by a product. It is appropriate that I take the time to state that Band in a Box is one of the worst pieces of software to be sold to the Purchase Band in a Box and you will receive the Real Band as well. The Real Band website gives no details about the product. Band in a Box what it sounds like? As soon as you launch the software, whatever music format you find on the dashboard will be what you are bound This is a jazz format, which is fine, but I want an entirely different format. I wish you the best To make matters worse, after selecting a chord progression, you are unable to play anything. There is nothing to report. The phrase "nothing happens" is not hyperbole, literally nothing occurs. My efforts to find the solution required me to spend 12 hours or so looking through In addition, the manual is useless and the software lacks any sense of direction. There are 300 pages of gibberish in the manual. There is a question in the customer's mind as to whether this is intentionally designed to drive a segment of the population insane. The only way to rate this service properly is to score NO STARS simply because that is the only way to rate it correctly. Be patient with customer service and don't sit around waiting for them.

Maggie Shaffer

| Feb 15, 2021

There is no doubt that this is the program you need if you want to do it all and make it sound like the real thing. I must be fully honest Since it has RealTracks, Band in a Box gives you the program's power with the sound of real instruments. I haven't used any other program that creates full band music, but Band in a Box has the Since I've never liked MIDI, when I heard this program promo, I was impressed but not quite sure how it would work in practice. The program did what it said it would do. Please do not hesitate to make a purchase if these were any of your doubts.

Jazmine Wolf

| Sep 01, 2021

The BIAB program seems like a nice program and I purchased it to create my own backing tracks for playing music for myself. Considering the limited options I have in terms of band and instrument choices, I am disappointed. As PG Music requires additional track paks for me to have a wider range of options, I am forced to purchase them. In the event that you intend to purchase software, I recommend that you purchase the PLUSPak, or choose another program.

Hadlee McLean

| Mar 10, 2021

I had an older version that was not working well, and decided to switch to the new version and I'm glad I This is easy to use if you just want to use the background that shows up when you pick a style. It is easy to add different instruments and add rests, etc. following the instructions provided. I highly recommend this book.

Madelynn Ali

| Jan 07, 2021

To gain a deeper understanding of chord relationships or to practice within specific modes All the features are included in this product.

Owen Schroeder

| Sep 06, 2020

Music education is not required for understanding the instructions, however a great sound can be achieved.

Megan HUMPHRIES

| Jan 09, 2021

Good to go! It is preferable to use the.

Freyja Conway

| Apr 10, 2021

Essentially, the program is a wretched joke. The options are either useless or can't accomplish what they are supposed to. Some of their requirements may or may not be prerequisites, which may or may not be accompanied by documentation that is absent or has no meaning. It is possible that a change you make to a file will not be reflected when played back until it is saved first. This means you must alter, save, and re-save the file You should open the file whenever a change is made. If the file is saved first, you can undo the change, or some other function. It is not possible to save the changes. That raises the question why should changes that cannot be saved be allowed to take effect? Wouldn't it be fun to do it for the sheer enjoyment? At random, across the range of program functions, it can take either direction. It would be interesting to use a word processor in this This is inexcusable. Some will say that there are many ways in which the same thing can be accomplished. There are some cases where this is flatly false. In this case, the same item appears under different headings and is not executed the same way. Another reason is that good chunks of "documentation" are gibberish - it's difficult to accurately determine the truth in those cases. This makes it difficult to determine what is happening, so the best you can do is guess. - Become accustomed to spending hours trying to interpret the "documentation" after spending hours interpreting it and failing. - Get ready to spend hours trying to synthesize a logic to the procedures (the infamous "write your own manual"). There appears to have been little or no effort put into resolving the inevitable conflicts as the product has been built piece by piece over the years. The result is a jumble of lurches, slobbering, and rambling.

Adeline Wheeler

| Sep 06, 2020