Canon Luster Photo Paper, 13" x 19" (50 Sheets) (LU-101 13X1950)

The quality of this paper is comparable to the Photo Paper Pro Semi-gloss paper made by Canon I have glossed. A comparison of two prints of the same image, one on this Luster and the other on this semi-gloss When there is a gloss on them, it is difficult to tell them apart. It is true that there are differences, but they are subtle and will likely go unseen unless they are carefully examined. In my opinion, hanging in a frame, 99 percent of people will not notice any differences between the papers at all. It is easy to tell the difference between the two papers from the back of them because of the semi-transparent back The back of the Gloss has the Canon logo all over it, while the back of the Luster has no print. The texture of the Luster paper is a bit more prominent than that of the Semi-gloss paper I have glossed. A slight emphasis is placed on the word "slightly. ". A close comparison of one blank sheet against the other is recommended When they have been printed on, the difference between one side and the other is more evident. According to my eyes, both papers look the same in terms of whiteness and tone. Both are just as warm or as cool as each You can view some of the papers I have uploaded because I uploaded them Photoshop was used to increase the highlights in the first two images, showing only one kind of paper close up. To better depict the surface texture, the highlights were boosted by 33%. There have not been any adjustments made to the remaining photos. The pros include In terms of quality, this product provides the same as Canon Semiconductors I have glossed. Luster is different from other Canon papers in that it does not have the Canon logo all over it like most others. Those who work in higher-level offices are likely to see this Papers for professional artwork that are made of top-quality materials, e. g. There are several companies that manufacture Canon Luster, such as Hahnemuehle, Ilford, Red River, Moab, Inkpress, and Innova. This Canon Luster is actually made The cons are The semi-automatic is not enough of an improvement over the semi-auto My personal opinion is that the gloss is worth it. As well as lacking the firm and convenient flip-over action, Luster paper is not as convenient and sturdy Other Canon stock comes in the same container as this one. I make only a minor complaint about this and this further illustrates how little difference I am able to.

Rachel Brady

| Oct 15, 2020

I am very pleased with the Printing my own photos is something I tend to do like most people. When looking for a product, I seek something that is affordable and of There are several printers in my house including a Canon MX922 All-in-One My photos turn out really well when I work one on one. While I even tried a few generic brands of photo papers, I found the Canon brands to offer a much better value when compared side by side On the other hand, I recently purchased graduation photos for my daughter ($$$) and I decided to print them off of the CD included with the purchase. Using a multitude of photo papers, from matte finish to glossy and glossy II, I saved time and money compared to buying prints at $10 per. I only used Canon cameras. Although all were acceptable for gift giving, this was my last graduation, so I wanted a more meaningful one. In researching the Canon Luster Photo Paper 50 sheets, I came up with the following results At $17, the 101 LTR is the best deal. The retail price is $34 (49). Compared to previous versions, 99) seemed to offer a good balance between the two. My daughter's main Cap and Gown photo was taken after I ran off a few black and white photos. I am stunned! I really like how professional they look! There is now a paper that I prefer to print on. There's no way those photo papers, cameras, and ink look so good for the price. I understand that you get what you pay for, especially when it comes to photos. As for the ink, it was also sourced from Amazon Ink Replacement Cartridges for Canon PGI- 24 Pack from ValueToner Ion XL 250XL The images I've printed with my 251XL Pixma MX922 have been by far the best ones I've ever seen -- and without breaking the bank. I bought my daughter these because I love her and as any good father would do, I want the best for her. She was happy with a matte and glossy finish, but these will blow her away! I love it. As a result, I will purchase more of this photo paper to maintain my quality finish. Furthermore, I intend to use this type of paper for all my glossy family photos on the walls. Thank you for your help. This is an excellent product.

Milan Whitney

| May 28, 2021

I would not recommend buying. That's what I hate when I see such reviews, but I understand now why they are so frustrating. I bought the paper so I could print photos (duh), however, the blacks faded within days. There are photos in this post The first is from a fresh print, and the next two are from a print that I hung I faced this problem within a week. You shouldn't waste your money on it. There is no way to explain how disappointed I am.

Maximilian Benson

| Mar 03, 2021

This paper was good for the price. I am a photographer and I used it for Even though I didn't scrutinize this paper with a magnifying glass as some of the others did, I can say that this is a good piece of work. As with anything you pay for, there isn't anything mind blowing about this, but it is also as good as the other brands at this price. It is unlikely that people will even notice the difference between this paper and one of high quality It costs three times as much to buy high-quality luster paper Clients are especially important. It is likely to be.

Brian Kline

| Oct 18, 2020

It just blows my mind how well this paper turned out. As a result, we enter a fair number of photo shows each month and let the image determine whether we choose gloss or semi-gloss The main types of luster products are glossy, metallic, etc. I decided to add luster to our product line for a test run.

We love this game! There are some photos in which this would not be appropriate, but there are others in which it stands out. The florals on Luster seem to be the ones I love the most. Their appearance is almost like something out of a painting. The process is similar to that of semi-automatic There is an increase in gloss but it is not the same as before. Perhaps a more pearlescent effect? The point is that this gets down to personal preference and attention to detail, but isn't that exactly what art is There's no doubt about it - the paper holds up well, the frames are perfect, and the colors are smooth and vibrant. The paper that we have been printing on has won awards. You can see what type of image we'll print on luster here. The image I had on luster I could not take a picture of because it was too light In addition to the focus and lighting issues of the camera, there are Photoshop settings to learn as well. Almost no computer screen can show the differences between the two. A good way to quantify how this differs from semigloss is to find out what printouts look like on one. This is your most reliable way of knowing what it looks like in real life. You can even just buy a box and try it out. You will always find countless photographers around who will gladly purchase the rest off of you on the used market if you don't use it. I strongly recommend this book.

Jada Hartman

| Aug 11, 2021