Shure SM48S-LC Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone with Lockable On/Off Switch, Shock-Mounted Cartridge and Pop Filter, A25D Mic Clip, Storage Bag, 3-pin XLR Connector, No Cable Included (SM48S-LC)
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
To avoid confusion with a previous response, this microphone accepts the female end of a standard XLR cable just like any other microphone that isn't USB or has a hardwired cable. A microphone that accepts the male end of an XLR cable is something I've never seen before.
Broccoli de rabe sautéed with a side of couscous with minced meat
Yes, this is possible. xlr wireless is a device that allows you to connect to the internet wirelessly
The world's most popular, universal microphone (every performing musician I've known and every band carries a reliable and indestructible SM58 mic), the Shure SM48 or Shure SM58, can be plugged into hundreds of speakers. It works with "performer" speakers, which have an amp and pre-amp built in. amp. Peavey, Bose, JBL, Electrovoice, and others are examples. I personally use Roland piano speakers and Roland Cube speakers, but any P. If you have a plug at the end of your cable, your system is likely to have both the traditional XLR and 14 inch speaker connections (the SM58 will accept either). The issue arises if you're limited to an indoor stereo system with "hi-fi" capability. speakers" that aren't self-contained as if they were musicians- Speakers for the performer This is a performer's microphone, similar to the one used by P. Speakers in large rooms and open spaces- as well as the amp of a musician (All those electric pianos require speakers.) However, an XLR or quarter-inch connector is required. Connection for a phone plug of 1 inch If you want to use it as a USB speaker with your computer, Amazon has it listed with the Shure X2U adapter ($100), which converts an XLR cable into a USB cable and adds features like a headphones jack (for no-latency monitoring), volume control, and 48V Phantom Power (which isn't needed with the SM48/58 because they're both dynamic microphones, not condenser mics). If you have a non-profit organization, a USB condenser microphone (e.g., a Shure SM58) The Shure adapter (ATT2020) could replace a mixing board interface, saving money and space while providing all the flexibility you need with just a single mic connected to a computer via USB. Blue (the Icycle?) does the same thing for half the price. ), but with fewer onboard controls and dubious durability (my Blue microphones, for example). Yeti are the ones who break or wear out first). Also, Planet Waves has some of the most basic and inexpensive (less than $10) adapters.
Selected User Reviews For Shure SM48S-LC Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone with Lockable On/Off Switch, Shock-Mounted Cartridge and Pop Filter, A25D Mic Clip, Storage Bag, 3-pin XLR Connector, No Cable Included (SM48S-LC)
I'm disappointed in Shure for allowing Amazon to sell this microphone with incorrect information. The adaptor is critical for anyone purchasing the mic, and Shure makes no mention of the MALE XLR end. So I used a customer review to claim that the male end cable is required, which is completely false. Please correct this for future customers. br>br>Thank you.
I suffer from autoimmune diseases, and using the DJ's mic at karaoke made me sick all the time. I now bring my own food and have never been sick. (Because the DJ is a friend, she doesn't mind if an extra mic is plugged in. ) )br>br>I've been using SM58s for decades, and the sound quality of this SM48 is just as good across the board. Pink Floyd's "Mother" has a low-volume bass voice, while Soundgarden's "Outshined" has a high-volume scream. " As well as everything else in between. Finally, a qualified sound engineer recommended this mic for my needs, and his advice was spot on.
With the "streamer" mics that capture everything in the room, I've had issues with background noise for quite some time. On the advice of a Reddit audio engineer who explained the differences between dynamic mics like this and condenser mics marketed to streamers, I purchased this mic. For about the same price as each of the three condenser mics I'd tried previously, I got this mic, an audio interface, a cable, and a desk stand. It's a huge difference. The audio is crystal clear, and there is no background noise. The voice has a very rich tone to it. br>br>It's not really a fair comparison in terms of pro audio because I'm not at all an "audio pro," but for streaming and recording youtube videos, this mic absolutely feels and sounds professional compared to condenser mics, and it's kind of ridiculous that you can get this mic, along with an interface, cable, and stand, for the same price as a condenser mic.
It's possible that different people will have different experiences. Also, don't forget about the windshields. It's a Great Lower Cost Version Of The SM 58 Best Used For Voice And Spoken Word And Home Studio Projects, And It'll Work For Disc Jockeys On A Tight Budget I Think It's A Great Addition To My Microphone Collection JUST ONE THING TO REMEMBER For the best results, use a windscreen with this microphone, which will eliminate annoying "P Pops" and give you a smoother sound overall. br>UPDATE 2/22/2018 I contacted Shure for information about the year the SM48's were first made, and they responded that the year was 1985, just 19 years after the SM58 was first made, and that it has been on the market for over 33 years like it's older siblings the 58 and 57, and that there is br>After conducting an A/B comparison of the Sm48 and 58 microphones, I came to the conclusion that while there are similarities, there are also differences (to borrow from a Beatles album title), I would refer to the SM 48 as "the SM 58 Naked," as it lacks the inner features of the aforementioned mic and thus has a more raw sound and can serve as a very worthy Studio Mic for many purposes as I previously mentioned.
Whether or not the SM48-A is a good fit for the SM48- Whether or not the LC is the best vocal microphone for you is determined by your sensitivity to the quality-to-price ratio as well as your personal preferences in microphone characteristics. Let's get right to the point because it appears to be a well-made instrument. I spent an afternoon comparing the SM48 ($30) to my nearly-new MacBook Pro. new SM58 ($100) and a nearly-new SM58 ($100). SM58 clone from China (DRV- Digital Reference) I got it for $10 on sale. I used my P to compare the three microphones. system, with the equalizer flat and reverb settings for the SM58 the way I like them, without attempting to optimize them for each microphone (seemed like too much effort). Furthermore, I was employing the P. line in to my Sony MDR-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Instead of using the P, use the 7506 Sound Monitor Headphones. To allow for more critical listening, speakers should be used. P. , I'd like to thank you for taking the time to listen to my voice , and settings, I found both Shure microphones to be quite usable for a live performance, but the DRV-2000 was the best of the bunch. In terms of vocal quality, 100 came in third place. br>br>After many comparisons over the course of an afternoon, I discovered that I prefer the sound of the SM58 enough that I will continue to use it as my live performance vocal microphone, despite the fact that I already own it; however, I would not be inconvenienced if I had to use the SM48. There are differences in how they sound, but I don't think they'd be noticeable to the average listener if they weren't in the P. During a live show, there will be speakers. That is most likely not the case with the DRV- 100 br>br>Then, using the same setup, I compared the two less expensive microphones as instrument microphones for my Martin 000-A from the 1960s. The sound was very different this time as well. The DRV-II's improved efficiency Each time I switched instruments, I had to adjust the gain, but I kept the equalizer set to zero. So far, I think the DRV- is a better option. I use the 100 as a guitar microphone because I prefer a brighter sound for fingerstyle guitar. When I mess around with the equalizer on the SM48, I think it'll be fine for instrument use. br>br>In conclusion, if it proves to be long-lasting, the SM48- For the money, the LC is a great microphone. It exemplifies how the electronic world works: You can get a lot of good quality for not a lot of money, and you might have to pay a lot more to get something even better.
For podcasting, this is a must-have. In this price range, these microphones are the best. They cost about half as much as the SM58 and sound nearly identical (I'd love to hear someone explain the difference). These are what I use in the studio and when I'm on the go. These are extremely durable, and the Shure brand is unbeatable. br>br>These are perfect for someone who is just getting started with podcasting.
Related Products For Shure SM48S-LC Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone with Lockable On/Off Switch, Shock-Mounted Cartridge and Pop Filter, A25D Mic Clip, Storage Bag, 3-pin XLR Connector, No Cable Included (SM48S-LC)
