UPlama 200PCS Qualitative Filter Paper Circles,Lab Supply Ashless Quantitative Filter Paper,94mm Diameter Cellulose Filter Paper with 20 Micron Particle Retention Medium Filtration Speed

UPlama 200PCS Qualitative Filter Paper Circles,Lab Supply Ashless Quantitative Filter Paper,94mm Diameter Cellulose Filter Paper with 20 Micron Particle Retention Medium Filtration Speed

$ 11.99

Score By Feature

Based on 124 ratings

Giftable

8.55

Delivery

8.41

Value for money

8.15

Packaging

8.54

OveReview Final Score

How Our Score Is Calculated

Product Description

A diameter of 94mm was found on the filter paper

The degree of fine particle filtration is the highest able to retain fine precipitates encountered during

The purpose of the instrument is to collect large particles in fast-moving air or fume

A filtering speed of 35 to 70 seconds and ash content of zero is considered useful.

The Buchner Filtering Funnel is compatible with StonyLab's 500ml bookner filter

Selected User Reviews For UPlama 200PCS Qualitative Filter Paper Circles,Lab Supply Ashless Quantitative Filter Paper,94mm Diameter Cellulose Filter Paper with 20 Micron Particle Retention Medium Filtration Speed

A reliable source! A thin, sturdy, thin and functional filter that is simple to place, easy to filter and has great filtering capacity

5/5

It is the second time I have received them and I will be placing more orders soon! I am grateful for your help.

Claire Barry

| Jan 02, 2021

This is not the case for viscous materials

3/5

Filters like this should not be used with highly viscous materials. The second thing is to add something. This would be a perfect match for watery.

Naya Macias

| Dec 20, 2020

There is no such paper

3/5

It is just regular paper, like the cheapest kind you could find for your printer, total.

Alessia Dillon

| Sep 20, 2020

There was an error in the filter cut size due to the mass of quantity

3/5

The measurement is off by a millimeter. Excellent, but it is difficult to fit the size we made them for if you need them to fit the size we made them for. As a result, I had to cut 200 of them to fit a smaller size, because they were 1 mm off from what they should have been.