Canon Mirrorless Camera [EOS M6 Mark II] (Body) for Vlogging|CMOS (APS-C) Sensor| Dual Pixel CMOS Auto Focus| Wi-Fi |Bluetooth and 4K Video, Black

I currently have a Canon 5D Mark IV and a Canon 7D MK II, and I Despite my disdain for their weight, I am happy with the way they look. As of this afternoon, I have received my M6 Mark II mirrorless body, as well as my mounting adapter and EVF. You can find a DC2 electronic viewfinder here. The camera I intend to use with my EF lenses will be my EOS EM-5. Then I went out into the yard and experimented with my EOS 24 and my M6 There are 70 F2 machines. It was a great result and I am extremely pleased with it. In short, it is a very early stage of this relationship and I will provide a fuller review in the upcoming As I predicted, it is a bit smaller than it appears, but I am sure I will get used to it. I will have more to say. On 12/18/19. In my experience, the camera is fantastic. I've spent some time learning what it can do. I find that the pictures are excellent and that the device has many features. The camera will be used extensively during a trip I plan to take in the spring, but I will probably use it as my backup camera. The Canon EOS lenses I own work flawlessly with my camera. As a result, I am very satisfied. There will be no classes on April This gem has been in my hands for hundreds of photos. I am amazed at how good it is. As far as I can tell, I would rate it 10 stars. Great camera, great shutter speed. You can't argue with that.

Adrian Davis

| Dec 28, 2020

The Canon M6 Mark II has been panned by professionals for its lack of native lenses. You need to move on. You can cross off the kit zoom lens such as the ones given out at Canon's out one M50 camera body and kit zoom lens, and another giveaway is next. A fast prime lens with a M mount. As well as the 16 mm f/1, I also use the 35 mm f/2. Full sensor equivalent focal length of 24 mm (f/4 will use 56 mm lens). The finished product measures 4 inches long The camera is also equipped with Canon's 32mm f/1 lens. These are excellent lenses since they are size 4 (51 mm). In 11x17 and 13x19 prints, one can see the advantage of the Mark II's higher resolution sensor (compared to its predecessor, the M50) and good prime glass. We can only hope that Canon releases an EF-S lens that is of high quality I believe that in the near future, M zoom lenses will be common. What's the point of spending thousands on a crop sensor prosumer I will give you two reasons for that. This prevents you from having to deal with the extreme bulk and weight of full sensor camera bodies and lenses. A second advantage of the Canon M6 Mark II is that it is a great camera for concert photography without requiring The camera looks like a compact camera for an inexpensive price. The stance of the camera should be within reach of the 32mm or 56mm A lack of EVF or zoom lens will draw attention to the problem. A slight elevation of the camera will allow you to see over the heads of people Don't cover the LCD display with the flash or shoot for too long, give those behind you a chance to see. Printing the wide shots and medium crops will be a great way for family and friends to enjoy this album. The commercial stuff should be left up to the professionals. A review of the subject matter will be published by April 4, 2020. The US Virgin Islands and British Virgin Islands were the focus of a 10-day vacation we just returned from. Rain, sunshine, and everything in between, the camera and lens got an active workout. An image taken with the Canon 32 mm f/1 lens. Taking photos with the optical zoom 4 was the most precise and produced the sharpest results. My review of many hours of Lightroom processing and processing has led me to believe the Canon lens is more accurate than the Sigma 16mm A photo of the St. Thomas synagogue is one of the fine examples of one of the category 4 photographs. It is a Sigma 56mm with a f/1 aperture. As well as 4, 4 did a great job. My method of shooting most outdoor shots was with either a + or a - aperture A 5-star rating. A shutter speed of 1/2000th and a focal length of 0 The world's smallest unit of time. By focusing about a third of the way into the frame, I was able to get both foreground and background in pretty sharp focus. a novice. If I haven't understood technical terms well, please forgive me. With Lightroom, I was only able to partially bring up shadows. There were a lot of times in the trip (and there were others) when I wished I had a full bag of snacks with me Among the impressive Nikon cameras lugged through the Baths by 2 German visitors (don't slip) were two full-frame cameras. The downside to this camera is that it has a few defects. Even after disabling the touch shutter from the menu, the shutter is always set to ENABLE mode. A focus point on the display that moves all over the place is a result of wasted shots and wasted focus points. In addition, the EVF stayed in my bag for the majority of the have mounted flash and remote trigger several times without the EVF. 1) The screen makes it easier to compose the shots. In spite of the intense sun during the Baths, I was able to clearly read the display with the display brightness set to maximum. If you don't need the EVF or your kit zoom lens, you should seriously consider buying this camera as a body only. After I ordered the second body, I doubled down on my order.

Gabriela Griffith

| Jul 12, 2021

This camera replaces an M3, which I used to use along with a Rebel XTi before that. Pictures taken with the 11-megapixel Nikon D3300 are shown in the samples Among the lenses in the lineup, my favorite is the 22 IS zoom. It has been frustrating for me, like most users of the M series cameras, to see Canon limit the features of The people who use the site seem to be paying attention to them. Depending on how you use your camera, this will be more than enough for most hobbyists or amateurs. I was amazed at the burst-shooting speed and low noise when pushing out the ISO when compared to the M3, and shocked at the burst-shooting speed. For years I have used bracketed exposures because that was what I was taught when I was shooting film. The user menu shortcut led me to the menu, but I had to dig a little to find it. My assumption was that the "HDR" menu setting in Lightroom would produce identical results, due to the fact that I employed bracketing when creating HDRs in Lightroom. Additionally, it creates the HDR in camera in addition to automatic bracketing. Ideally, it would be great to be able to post-process, but using the "natural" setting and +/- correction seems to work fine. You have the option to stop at the first stop or to set it to automatic. I find some of the arty HDR settings to be a bit cartoonish. The HDR shot and the bracketed one were both out and I picked the one I preferred from the four, which was any of the four It has been a while since I got to the other apps Rather than adding effect to the image in the camera, I prefer to post-process my images. It is typical for me to just leave the mode dial in M when I am done. Why would we do this if not for the purpose of learning? I made a bad job of it As a reference, the portrait example (more on that below) was taken in P mode. Due to the fact that I rely on autofocus and have adapted my shooting style to screens instead of the hot shoe mounted eyepiece, I do not use this device. When operating the viewing screen in bright sun, I can still read the screen, but I rely more upon the histogram and meter than I might when looking through When I am writing a comment it gets a little cluttered, but I've trained myself to look through the text and to use the "info" button. Despite improvements among other things, communication between the app and the camera is still not much better. I have never been able to figure out how to set them For some features (such as georeferencing) Bluetooth is required, while for others (such as remote shooting) WiFi is required. Is it because the camera cannot be connected to the iOS app with both methods? Would it be better to send the data in the way it needs to be sent? I can only connect my Mac and camera via WiFi, although it will connect via USB if I choose. To transfer photos, you need a USB type C cable. It is yet again a matter of fiddling around with settings that isn't In addition, the WiFi radio is so underpowered that I was only able to get a few feet away before it ceased to work. It was basically just a matter of randomly pressing the shutter button on the app and guessing when I took the picture of me on top of the rock ledge. My test probably took place in a high-quality setting environments may be worse (note the antenna farms in the example picture), but I've confirmed it's very bad in a suburban setting as well. I don't think this is a normal use case, but it still applies. It is my idea to use this body someday on a drone I plan to build myself that really excites me about this body. Canon seems to have gotten this part right for a change, even if it is a little heavier than I would like. You'll find a three-pin remote shutter release like you would expect from Canon. In order to trigger the shutter on my drone, I will be using a simple relay. In HDMI outputs, the information can be the same as the screen on the back (and will be changed with a touch of It should be possible for the drone to obtain a time stamp in the log via the hot shoe. You did a great job. Although it remains to be seen to what extent remote control can be hacked by means of WiFi, even if I have to use P mode I will maintain a high degree In the midst of all the controversy, there is the long-standing question of whether Canon will continue to support the EOS-series cameras Would it be possible to create a compact mirrorless line like Olympus did with the PEN and Micro 4/3? I think they probably will, if only to stay in the compact mirrorless category. I find the lens selection on this camera not the greatest, but it covers most of what I do (and I can always use an As for the position of this format in the catalog, I am inclined to think it fits nicely with rangefinder classic. I have a funny note to share. This camera is thought of by many as being a small one. Comparing the sizes of my old AE-2000 with the new one I have a Nikon 1 and a Nikkormat film camera. It is fair to say that these cameras would be considered rather large back in the day, If you added a film to your page - By using a burning motor drive and obtaining a high capacity film back (if it was available), the film cameras grew pretty big. However, what's the point of that these days? The large size of the M6 could actually be better ergonomically to keep you from randomly pushing buttons (which is what I find myself doing with the M6), but that would also add weight and bulk to your bag.

Marcellus Everett

| Nov 16, 2020