Collector Protector Sleeves for Vinyl Record Storage | Vinyl Storage Anti Static Record Sleeves with Archival Paper to Protect from Dust & Scratches | 50-Pack Inner Protective Sleeves for 12” Albums

My mission this month is to find the BEST cheap inner record sleeves on the market. I selected these for my next batch of shipments because they had almost universally positive reviews. In this price range, these main competitors are Diskeeper 2 and Diskeeper 3. The following anti-RFID sensors are in place There are usually 5 dollars in savings when you buy static record sleeves (50 pack). Throughout reviews, it has been stated that these are a better option, but I believe they're basically the same, or that the Diskeeper may even be significantly better. This could be the case You need to be the best. How about you? Which do you think would be best? This is what we need to do. Anti-Malware
The following capabilities are static The Collector Protector has a sliver of advantage, but it is almost equally powerful overall. The following is the build quality for the above item (CP 1, DK 0) Using Collector Protector, you are protected by a THIN, almost tissue-thin layer of plastic It's made of a thin plastic material in Rice paper is used on the back to give it more stability. In Diskeeper, the plastic is more substantial, but the rice paper is absent. It's your choice, but Diskeeper will win. *Brief information about how records are protected (CP 1, DK 1) The rice paper backing of Collector Protectors is super soft and will never harm records. How well will the tissue paper front protect you? I have my doubts In my mind, I feel as if I could scratch a record through In my opinion, DK is the clear winner. A given device is easy to use when it is (CP 1, DK 2)

The sleeves of both records are cheap, unstructured, flimsy, and flimsy again. Thus, with both models you will find that the outer sleeves are difficult to fit comfortably. It is common for both models to bunch. Despite the tie, this isn't the end of the world. I believe that (CP 1, DK 2)
and intangibles While MoFi's inner sleeves have inconsistent sizing, both CP and DK's inner sleeves have consistent measurements, and I have not encountered a single dud. My only complaint is that the rice paper backing in CP doesn't extend to the bottom of the sleeve - I find it very annoying. The bottom part stops about a half inch from the top. The backing of the rice paper board is not even full length This is similar to a back brace made of rice paper. A small quibble that will never matter, but take another look at it what part of the record has this left uncovered? I. e. the very first grooves of the song. It'll be easy to hear damage if that flimsy CP plastic ever broke and allowed it in from the back within the first 5 seconds of a record. It would have been better if you just covered the entire back in rice paper, CP. I wanted to know what you saved. The cost of an sleeve is . 0005 cents? This is annoying. What is the moral of the story? (CP 1, DK 3) In my opinion, neither program is a bad choice, since they are both accurate in pricing, but Diskeeper is my preferred provider. When you order from DK, you get a complete package There are around seven. I would give this a 5/10 Sleeve that is static in nature. You are getting a 9 when you order CP. The back of the rice paper sleeves is 5/10, and the front is A five-star envelope with tissue paper on the front. It does not matter how you use these quality inner sleeves, your records are better protected than if you were not to use them. Make sure you keep spinning no matter what brings you happiness. In the future, I would like to purchase the very expensive DK Audiophile inner sleeves. These are considered to be the holy grail of inner sleeves.

Santos Livingston

| Apr 17, 2021

It is not uncommon for me to inherit and adopt used records that don't come with the actual records themselves. I think that you should not throw your vinyl records in the cardboard jacket raw, like that is wrong! It is time to call in Vinyl Protective Services! There are no words to describe these inner sleeves. The vinyl is very easy to slip in and out of as well as fitting right into the jacket. You can also make use of this on older paper sleeves that may be torn or worn out. I highly recommend this book.

Liliana Oliver

| Jul 17, 2021

Since years ago I have been buying archival inner sleeves to go with my vast record collection. Mofi inner sleeves are usually my go-to inner sleeves, but when I looked to order them they were sold out. So, I decided to try these. Compared to record sleeves, they are very thin, and most of the rice paper on the sleeves is off-centered and creased, which makes it almost impossible to slip into the Many of the sleeves are unusable because of this defect. If you are an avid record collector, my recommendation is to spend the extra money on a better quality inner sleeve. You would probably be happy with this item if all you want is something cheap that will be better than a paper sleeve.

Andi Carey

| Jul 12, 2021

It's a decent quality, not quite the same as that of Mobile Fidelity, but enough to make it worth buying. I was not a fan of the fact that the sleeves are packaged with a warning that says to not bend them. The package, however, was folded in half and stuffed in a soft and too small Because of this, the sleeves were bent in half while in transit. There is a wrinkle across the middle of every one of them. can be used, since they are usable I think whoever packaged this did a fantastic job - they just had to follow the instructions. As well as to prevent them from getting bent when they were shipped to the buyer It was blown by that person. As long as you're willing to buy new sleeves for your records, it's reasonable to expect them to arrive properly packaged. This may have been the reason for the manufacturer's warning "DON'T BEND!". Do you agree? There is no better way to put it.

Royal Terrell

| Jul 31, 2021

I get a lot of work out of these, so they will last a very long time. I felt as if I were wearing a velvet glove on my hand. The most I typically buy is I have thousands of records, so I'd rather not pay that much if I have hundreds of fi's for 20 bucks. As long as I can get them for a good price, I'll likely stick with these. In general, I see them sold For 20 dollars, you can get a pack of 60 or 75. It will be a lifelong member of the team if the cost stays under 20 or if some additional sleeves are added for 20. As a result, these are quality sleeves, but there is no incentive to switch to a different brand when the prices and quantities are basically equal. It would be better if you merged into one giant corporation and had price fixing everywhere. Please forgive me if I am a bit off-topic. Here we are again talking about It is true that these sleeves are excellent and yes you should take the time to see them I wish you the best and cheers, Buzzsawtc.

Gwen Ward

| Oct 12, 2020

I'm sure that I'll buy more in the future given that they feel identical in every way to the other 3 ply sleeves, but they are slightly less expensive. These are the sleeves I replace all my inner sleeves with, and since they are not bulky, I can still keep the original inner sleeves when I need them (lyrics, liner notes, etc).

Colton Spencer

| Mar 29, 2021

This is a great pair of inner sleeves. I have no problem slipping in and out of the record. The sleeves are quite similar to the ones that I will be using in the future in addition to the Mofi sleeves. There was recently a 50 pk of the Big Fudge inner sleeves in my possession, but they were too tight to hold the records. Using Big Fudge outer sleeves as well and love them, but I want everyone to know that these inners are the ones you need.

Westley ASHTON

| Jul 10, 2021

As expected, these are of high quality and perform as predicted. I don't need to worry about static cling and dust on my records. It would be nice to see the corners rounded next time. Sometimes when inserting these into record sleeves the corners of the inserts bunch up and they are hard to slide in.

Kyng Luna

| Oct 20, 2020