Tommy John Men's Underwear, Boxer Briefs, Cool Cotton Fabric Trunk with 4" Inseam, 3 Pack
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
I believe it simply refers to the variety of sizes available for purchase. br>In my case, the code is simply LG.
31-inch waist The number 34 is a medium.
They are selling the mens, 100 percent cotton, grey pair only, that I have received and purchased, like 4 packs at 304 a pair, so i personally will not buy the grey any longer, because the back side tears very easily, they tried to blame it on bleach, and the way you wash, but that is not the case, because I am a 100% clean hiney person, because I cannot stand smells or nasty rumps, ok. So the blue pair is supposed to be a polyester and cotton mix, and I've never had an issue with Tommy Johns mens underwear from that brand. The grey cotton, on the other hand, is a farce and a $30 rip-off to me, as it is too shear and tears too easily, and I have no, repeat no) nails; only a finger scratch tore two pairs, and I was very gentle with the scratch on the second pair, so it is simply to shear. I won't be buying grey any longer, and I'm looking for a solid 100% COTTON MENS UNDERWEAR, THINKING OF DELUTH, AS I HAVE PURCHASED THEM IN THE PAST 5 YEARS AND THEY ARE STILL IN GREAT SHAPE AND MADE WELL, TOP STANDARDS AND A GRADE OF A, DULUTH. THE 100 PERCENT COTTON MENS TOMMY JOHNS GREY RECEIVES AN F. , 30 DOLLARS IS TOO MUCH FOR UNDERWEAR THAT TEARS SO EASILY, THE TRUTH IS 100%. TOMMY JOHNS, EVEN THOUGH I WILL BUY THE BLUE ONES FROM THEM. RGVSR, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
Selected User Reviews For Tommy John Men's Underwear, Boxer Briefs, Cool Cotton Fabric Trunk with 4" Inseam, 3 Pack
They are intentionally misleading customers by displaying a long inseam and then selling a short inseam. The short inseam is extremely uncomfortable, but it is significantly less expensive than the longer ones. This is the second time they've charged the long inseam price, and it's a rip-off. To avoid the fraud, purchase them directly from Tommy John.
I've never had a pair of underwear that I've found to be more comfortable. I've been a Haynes, Fruit of the Loom, customer for as long as I can remember. Wearer of jockey briefs. The boys would occasionally escape and get mashed when I sat down on the tidy whitey brief, which was my main gripe. Tommy Johns isn't going to let that happen. The boys are held in a pouch that is slightly raised to prevent them from being mashed. All of my neat whiteys will be thrown away. Tommy Johns, I'd like to express my gratitude for everything you've done for.
Tommy John sponsors a lot of podcasts, and I've listened to a lot of them. They're bragging about how fantastic they are. However, because they are sponsored, they are required to say that they are fantastic. I decided to take a chance and buy a three-pack. They are the most comfortable, smooth, and soft underwear I've ever purchased. I've experimented with the Hanes brand. Calvin Klein, Papa, and a slew of other celebrities are among them. These are the best, and while they are $33 per pair, a calvin is $22, which is a good deal. If you have the extra ten dollars per pair, go for it. DO IT!.
I don't like negative reviews, but these are very expensive, and I bought the same size as my jeans, but the Tommy John boxers were too small for me. When you put them on, they should be snug. However, if you take a seat, the band will begin to play. The crotch is too small, which binds the thighs and waist, and the legs ride up to bunch in the crotch. I couldn't stand them after 15 minutes because they were so uncomfortable. Tommy John underwear is not for adult men, in my opinion.
I decided to try a pair of Tommy John underwear after hearing so much about them and seeing so many Google ads about how great they are. The fit is excellent, the fabric appears to be of excellent quality, and the construction appears to be excellent. As a result, this is a good product with a reasonable price. However, even the Cool Cotton fabric relies on a significant amount of spandex to achieve the same fit as an all-cotton fabric would. It was just a little too much spandex for me, which I don't find increases cooling but rather the opposite; spandex is always just a tad wet for me, which I don't like. That's fine as a sportswear item, but not as a daily trunk. The thinness of the fabric contributes to its light and airy feel. I'm not a fan of the fabric weight, which is next to nothing. I prefer a trunk or brief that is heavier in weight, made mostly or entirely of cotton, and is well cut and constructed. For me, Flint and Tinder, Tommy Hilfiger, and Mack Weldon are superior to Tommy John. The top loading fly appeals to me, but not enough to overcome the other issues, which are purely personal preferences and do not reflect the high quality of this trunk. Simply be aware of the options available to you.
I'm a 34-inch waisted woman who bought a large pair of pants. In the buttocks and thighs, they're far too tight. They kept sliding down, and I had to constantly pull them up. The worst part is that they are completely transparent in all areas except for your garbage. It was not at all what was advertised, and it was the worst underwear purchase I've ever made.
All of these "We reinvented the X product" claims have made me skeptical, but Tommy Johns delivers the goods. These boxer briefs are super comfy, and the quick draw fly is a game changer. For a long time, I've been frustrated with fly mechanisms on boxers/boxer briefs, and without going into logistics, what Tommy John has done is simply superior, as you can see.
When a tucked-in shirt hung over the Quick Draw Fly, it was difficult to find it. The fly's edge was thin and difficult to distinguish from the trunks' top edge. The problem was solved by cutting the fly's edge down 2 inches, folding it down, rolling it down, and stitching it in place. The fly's edge is now thicker, more easily felt, and is 2 inches lower than the top edge of the trunks or any fold in the material, so it won't be confused with them.