DAVID ARCHY Men's Underwear Breathable Boxer Briefs Bamboo Rayon Trunks in 3 or 4 Pack
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
Small is a size I'm not familiar with. According to other reviews, these briefs run small and should be ordered a size up. I usually wear a large size. These briefs were purchased in an extra large size and fit perfectly. If you order a size larger, I would recommend this product.
Almost identical I bought both the DA micro modal and these bamboo fiber ones, and they are almost indistinguishable in feel. I could barely tell the difference in the materials, so I asked my gf which felt better (had her close her eyes and feel both at the same time) and she said the micro modal one was marginally softer (though she said it was very difficult to tell the difference).br>Other than that, compared to the DA micro modal underwear: 1) the pouch is a little bigger, and 2) the vertical seam across the front isn't as nice/clean as the micro modal undies.
Yes. Two weeks later, the 2XL size will become available. Checking in is always a pleasure. Thanks.
They're referring to a pack of three or four items. It is dependent on the underwear model you select: Some have longer legs, and the pack includes three of them. If you move your mouse pointer over the various little icon photos under 'color,' you'll notice that some come in packs of four and others only have three.
Selected User Reviews For DAVID ARCHY Men's Underwear Breathable Boxer Briefs Bamboo Rayon Trunks in 3 or 4 Pack
I was overjoyed to receive the package containing new underwear for my package, as if I were a child opening gifts on Christmas. I was so excited because of the positive reviews that I spent the entire day staring out the window, waiting for the white sprinter to arrive at the house. Bezos deserves praise for his promptness. br>br>I took the fabric against my cheek as I opened the box and slowly unraveled the first pair. Was there a glimmer of something? Is it possible that I'm starting to fall in love? I warned you not to let another pair break your heart, and I was referring to you, Mr Thomas Johnathan. Yes, I chose the Maytag's quick wash option to avoid any delays. It's possible that this is the right one for you. br>br>At long last, I was ready to put on my new bamboo. The silky, buttery smooth texture is incredible. The support for cupping. amazing. Was it finally time for me to reopen my heart? Yes, I replied as I glided across the room. What's going on here? Is it possible that I left some tags behind? No, the designers decided that a seam from the top of the balls to the taint would be appropriate. You know, the skin on a man's body that is the most sensitive. This isn't any old seam, though. It's thick and durable, similar to what you'd find on an America's Cup boat's sail. While I require that level of durability when crossing oceans, it is not required when crossing the yard; the sensation is best described as rubbing the backside of your jewels with a kitchen microplane similar to the one used to grate aged Parmigiano Reggiano on top of your pappardelle. br>br>For a variety of reasons, I am not comfortable returning previously worn undergarments, much like discovering a rotten watermelon after splitting it. Giving Alexa access to my DNA puts me in grave danger. br>br>2 stars, 2nd star because these are superior to other plants for covering trash, such as poison ivy leaves.
Long-lasting, durable, and comfortable, with plenty of crotch room. Because it does not restrict your part, it will show up better than it would if you were wearing tighter underwear. I've gone through the four-step procedure. They've been my favorite underwear for years.
Tommy John, Duluth Bullpen, Hanes, Fruit of the Loom, and these are just a few of the brands I've tried. These are a good size for small people. They are soft but snug, and I am 6'5" with a 42 waist. They don't ride up, but they all ride down, revealing cleavage or a plumber's crack. So, my final verdict on these is that they are better than Fruit of the Loom but not as good as the others. TJ, Hanes, David Archy, and FL have all been beaten by Duluth. I have a Saxx brand as well, which I completely forgot about. Those are the second and third places, respectively, after Hanes. Tommy John was, by far, the best fabric. Duluth was the best fit. These aren't exactly top-of-the-line items. Perhaps this is why a three- or four-pack costs the same as the rest. I'm not going to buy any more of these. Maybe they'd be better if they were bigger.
This was the third time I bought David Archy underwear. Some perspective: I usually wear 36" pants with a loose waistband, but 34" waist pants are too small for me. I buy a size smaller in any other traditional underwear brand because I prefer a tight fit. I knew not to buy a smaller size because I had previously purchased these, so I purchased a size L, which should be the "correct" size. The waist on these is simply too tight; I had to return them and purchase an XL because the rest of the underwear was perfect. I find it strange that I wear a 36" bra but need to purchase underwear in the 40" – 42" range. It should be the other way around. br>br>I measured a pair of new, unwashed LARGE underwear, and they were 15. 5" wide and 32" around the circumference. Even with a small amount of stretch, that's a 33-percentage-point increase. The 34" waist is too tight for a 36" waist. br>br>Having said that, David Archy underwear is fantastic; just order a size larger than you require.
I adore these underwear because they keep everything in place and are super soft and comfortable. I like how they have a fly, which isn't something you'll find on many trunks or underwear. My waist is about 36 inches, so I wear a large and they fit perfectly. Well, that's where my underwear is tucked away under my belly button. Another reason I like these underwear is that, despite the fact that they rest under my belly button, they don't sag or feel loose and baggy; they keep everything in place.
It's truly amazing. Things like underwear have gradually become more familiar to me - It wasn't something I was taught about 60 years ago (when everything was essentially a flour sack), and I didn't realize there was such a difference. Many years ago, I graduated from white briefs to boxer briefs, which I had grown up wearing. Those were more comfortable, and I liked the basic ones I'd been wearing until recently, when they didn't fit me properly - following a long period of crotch rot I experimented with a variety of styles in search of one that would cup the man's face. It fit perfectly without crimping and protected my legs from chafing. When I came across these, I decided to call it a day. They're simply divine. The material is lightweight and extremely soft, but it is sturdy enough to provide the protection I require. Because of this, and because they don't force anything into unnatural positions if you get my drift - they basically feel like I'm not wearing anything at all. At the same time, they do a good job of keeping you from flopping around. The length of the legs is just right - Many boxer briefs have a 3" length that is too short for my comfort, and the 9" length is far too long. The 5" length of these covers everything you need and doesn't feel claustrophobic. With enough bending and moving, anything that isn't tourniquet tight will ride up, but I've been very happy with these - They aren't affected by "normal" walking, sitting, or even dance classes. When doing a lot of fairly strenuous movement, some adjustments are required, but they are simple to make - It's also not too bothersome because the fabric is so light. According to some reviews, there isn't a seam up the back. They appear to be well-made and have good stitching. My only gripe, if there is one, is that they are way over-priced. packaged. It's nice to have as a gift, but it doesn't appear to be required. I also enjoy the simple-to-use features. unused tags - Just don't pull them both off at the same time: If you rip off the top one, the bottom one will simply fall away.