2(X)IST Men's Cotton Stretch No Show Trunk 3-Pack
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
There isn't a fly in sight.
No, there are no pockets. Boxer briefs in their most basic form.
Return to Amazon with them.
This is a difficult question to answer because they were different every time I ordered them. They're tighter and more supportive than usual, in my opinion. However, because the leg length (width of the crotch seam) varied greatly from package to package, I stopped buying them.
Selected User Reviews For 2(X)IST Men's Cotton Stretch No Show Trunk 3-Pack
2(X) IST stretch no-show men's underwear comes in a variety of styles. The name is the same, but one package has a 10 inch inseam (measured across the crotch from one leg hem to the other) and the other has a 7 inch inseam (the middle grey pair). They're only 4 inches long (black at bottom of hoot) in THIS package. They'll be returning! The grey ones, which have a 7-inch inseam, were also purchased from Amazon. the 3- This pack included a pair of "poppy red" socks (which are now in the wash). Because I believe this is a 2(X)IST issue, I can't guarantee that would be the case if you purchased that pack from that other vendor. br>br>I purchased this brand and this "style" description at Marshalls for the first time. The issue is the same: The first pack was 10 inches long, while the second was only 3 inches long. Anything under the age of seven will be returned to you. It isn't just about how we feel or how we appear in our case. A 'Depends' pad can't be supported and kept centered on anything smaller than 7in. They should make it possible to understand exactly what you're purchasing. br> Some establishments refuse to accept returned underwear. br>br>By the way, I have no idea what the term "no show" means. If they're implying that they ride low and the waist won't show through your jeans, I'm here to tell you that they're not. They are, however, ideal. Yes, if they mean that the leg hem is fitted to your leg so that no one can see your dunnage when they look up your Bermudas. That's fantastic! Even with the inseams that aren't too long. The legs, on the other hand, aren't overly restricted. br>OK, if no-show means they aren't bulky and won't show, that's fine. br>The legs could never be seen beneath any men's outer shorts. So, what exactly do they mean when they say "no show"? br>To return to my original gripe- Make them all the same color or give them unique names!.
They aren't 'knock-offs,' either. Then I'm perplexed as to why a business would alter a successful formula. "These are NOT the underwear you're after. " They're also made of a thinner fabric. br>br> They're also a lot smaller than the ones before them. If you look at the comparison images I've attached, you'll see what I mean. You'll notice more than just the size difference. The older pair's seams, on the other hand, are noticeably more substantial. br>br>The ability to hold things in place has been completely removed from the 'pouch. ' These underwear are completely useless due to the thin fabric and weak seams. not to mention the differences in size. From the moment you slip into them, they'll start riding up your crack. An utter. Also, it was a complete waste of money on my part. br>br>I'm not sure if buying these in stores will give you the same quality as buying them online. However, I can tell you right now that if you buy these from this seller, you will be disappointed. You will NOT receive what you believe you will receive. Boo!.
After only a few months, these new ones are already beginning to show signs of wear. After one year, the originals are still going strong. There is no sewn-in label on the new ones. Instead, the brand is printed on the inside, and I'm getting holes in them and they're separating from the waist band. br>br>Either they were redesigned to reduce manufacturing costs, or I got knockoffs.
I was so excited about this product because I thought I'd finally found the perfect trunk. The first of the three pairs I received had two extremely durable pairs and a fantastic front pouch that lifts and supports. Everything about this place is extremely relaxing. The set's third trunk, for some reason, appeared to be much smaller and lacked the pouch space. I assumed it was a single flaw or that it had shrunk unexpectedly in the wash. I placed a second order, hoping that they would be as good as the first. However, the second set of three anomalies appeared to be identical to the first. There is NO CONSISTENCY between the trunks, as you can see in the photo above! It's the SAME PRODUCT, but the back trunk is much longer and the pouch area is much larger. The front trunk is extremely small and crams everything into it. How could the same underwear have so many variations? The hunt is still going on.
The standard has slipped. These were the best-fitting underwear I could find last year and the year before. I bought some more about two weeks ago, and they're a complete waste of money. On or around October 15, 2018. They're not the same as the ones I got a few weeks ago. The thickness and strength of the material are about half that of the original. After a single wash, the elastics snapped. Another instance of a clothing company attempting to save money by cutting corners. Forever, you have lost me as a customer. They're also sold in department stores under the brand Evolve. I'm not going to buy anything from them under any brand name they're associated with.
This is a very classic 2(x)ist design, and it reminds me of their early-2000s product. If you're used to 2(x)ist and like the way it looks and feels, this is the right option for you. br>br>For those who aren't familiar with the product, it's a classic design that looks similar to what you'd find in a typical off-the-shelf store. the- At the store, shelf brands such as Hanes, FTL, Jockey, and others are available. In terms of fit, it's similar to those, but it's cut and support around the pouch is better. It's pleasant to wear on a daily basis, but there are many better options available. The only difference between the better options and these three is that you'll pay the same for one of those pairs as you would for these three. From that perspective, these are a much better deal. br>br>Also, the waistband, in my opinion, cuts in a little too much on my waist; I prefer larger waistbands, but they may not be for everyone. br>br>Overall, it's a good deal for the 3-night stay. Pack and a nice 'upgrade' over your standard store-bought pairs, but not the best out there.
I don't always want to wear a brief, and boxers, particularly me with my muscular thighs, can sometimes climb up. They keep everything in place but don't compress to the point of being flat. as if you're getting ready to compete on RuPaul's Drag Race, fronted and tucked They also don't show up with a wedge salad that no one wants to eat.
Related Products For 2(X)IST Men's Cotton Stretch No Show Trunk 3-Pack
