Fruit of the Loom Men's Basic White Brief Multipack
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
I have a 36-inch waist, and the Large size is just right for me. According to their own website, Fruit of the Loom recently changed their underwear sizes, with large now being 36-38. Underwear should be 38 inches long, and the X-Size should be 38 inches long. The large size ranges from 40 to 60 pounds.
No tags! Information is printed on it.
The price is for a seven-pack.
They ordered this twice (about a week apart), with the second order containing the words "dual defense." Personally, I'm fine with either at the price I paid.
Selected User Reviews For Fruit of the Loom Men's Basic White Brief Multipack
There's not much more that anyone can add to the over 3000 reviews that have already been written, except for one thing that appears to be missing. . . a direct comparison between this pack of men's white briefs and its closest competitor in terms of "value priced" packaging, the.
If I had the option, I would award ZERO stars. br>The "New" sizing has been either too small or too large for the past couple of years. We initially assumed that the pack of Large he purchased (at Walmart) had the wrong size labels on it and had been returned. The next pack was the same as the previous one. After that, we went to Amazon to see what they had to offer. Nope. Exactly the same issue. Then he calculated his size based on the feedback. Nope. br>As a result, the waist bands and leg openings on the Large ones (which used to fit 38-42 inches) are now (and have been for the past year and a half) either too small or too large. 40, which has recently been reintroduced 36" in length 38), and the leg openings on X-Size are far too large. They used to fit 42-inch TVs. 44, which has been renamed 40 x 40 cm 42). They also appear to have a shorter rise, a higher leg, or a too-long crotch, or something. The material is flimsier, and the elastic isn't up to par. The material pulls away from the band after 6 months, causing holes, whereas the underwear used to last 5 years. Yes, we tried other FOTL styles, but none of them fit quite right. He now has an uncomfortable drawer full of ill-fitting underwear. Why didn't you just keep them the same and call them "Classic" and release a new re-release? a suitable size line for the word "Modern" (or a similar term). like the new Corporate Greed line, for example)? br>Congratulations, FOTL; you've now joined the ranks of the other brands that don't fit right and wear out quickly. which is why he has been a long-term customer: because your underwear USED TO FIT AND LAST FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS Thank you for reinventing and destroying what has worked for my husband (and many other men, according to what I've read) for the past 50 years.
Beware: On Amazon, the Fruit of the Loom briefs with the size indicated vertically are one size smaller than the size indicated. The "Medium" is a small 30" x 30" x 30" x 30" x 30" x 30" x 30" 32". The "Large" is a medium-sized shirt, measuring 34"-36" in length. 36".
Manufacturers of men's briefs have decided, for some reason, that elastic around the legs is a good idea. and there's an unnecessary frill in the "must-open opening"! In these areas, it appears that ALL manufacturers have abandoned real elastic. However, the amount of money they may be saving makes no sense to me! br>br>I know I returned the briefs after only wearing them a couple of times. And, I only wore them to confirm what I had already determined when I opened the package and checked the elastic (ie: that the elastic was a waste of time! )br>br>Meanwhile, I'd like to offer the following advice: If you're looking for an "elastic-like" feel, this is the product for you. Do not purchase these briefs if you are "fit. " br>br>PS: if you're looking for a unique way to express yourself, try using the words " For more than 70 years, I've worn briefs. In addition, in the last ten years, there has been a significant increase in the For the past 15 years, I've noticed a "serious" lack of quality in almost every manufacturer's product! Either the elastic fit (as in these FOL briefs) or the cotton fabric (which usually shows up after a few washes) or the waist band(s) are of poor quality. If "they" can find a way to make it less expensive in some way, they will! br>br>And if you're interested in seeing what I'm wearing right now, click here. I had no choice but to change into "boxers," a style I despise! However, I figure I'll only have to bear this "discomfort" for another 20 years. Then I'll put on a pair of Pure White Robes with Gold Trim and listen to "Hosannah. " Hosannah! "for the rest of eternity" [at least, that's what Mark Twain predicts!.