Under Armour Men's Tech 6-inch Boxerjock 2-Pack
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
I tumbled the machine when it was warm. That's all there is to it.
Yes, I really like them a lot
It is the height of the pants leg as measured from your thigh to the ground. As well as the 5" and 9" models, they also offer the 3" model. In comparison, the 5" is nearly knee length, the 3" is like a classic boxer brief. I have no more to do with your schooling.
Goods are not as roomy as they used to be. Compared to those, these are more restrictive. As far as I'm concerned, the original is best.
Selected User Reviews For Under Armour Men's Tech 6-inch Boxerjock 2-Pack
This Under Armour version really caught my eye and I thought it would be perfect for him to replace his old raggedy pair. You're doing a great job, these The fit and feel of these are perfect for my husband. In the future, I plan to buy more for him. Only down side is that he realizes how flat his butt is now because his pants have a tendency to slide off because of It's fine with me if the silk is there.
A few weeks ago, I purchased Tech 6" Boxerjocks and Tech Mesh 6" Boxerjocks. Boxerjocks are traditionally made of Tech Boxer material, which is soft and comfortable. It's great to have a new fabric as technical as Tech Mesh, but the workmanship is less than satisfactory. I find the seams to be extremely rough, and the thread and stitch pattern to be irritating. Here is a photo so you can see for yourself how high the quality is. These items were ordered directly from Amazon (not a seller) and came in the boxes they were expected to come in.
The brand could not be discerned as soon as I put them on lol You could not tell the company brand
I exchanged for another pair and had the same problem. A RECENT UPDATE There are crooked people at the store too. It is apparent that UA has crooked ones, so your final decision will depend on whether you like them or not. My second pair of earrings is still in good condition.
The types of Boxerjock's from Under Armour were not as similar to those from Under Armour, which I did not recognize. The more I focused on the words "Boxerjocks" and the pictures, the more I realized they were a different variety from the originals -- they were Quite a bit of difference, in my opinion. have suffered from skin irritation and redness in the crotch area after wearing my boxerjocks "tech" style. The stitching in the crotch area is extremely coarse and rough and causes itching, rubbing, and redness. A Boxerjock that is "Original" is more soft to touch and uses a different type of stitching which is very soft and nonabrasive The skin is left feeling smooth and abrasive. It is highly recommended to avoid these and go with Under Armour's "Original" Boxerjocks which don't fall into this "Tech" category but are much better in quality and comfort.
For my first Under Armour purchase, I bought a pair of Under Armour underwear & gloves The legs creep up worse than any underwear I've ever purchased, and they're uncomfortable and too tight My constant tug at them causes them to fall Getting so uncomfortable with such a high-end product is way too expensive. soft, but the waistband has a stiff label that even after cutting it off, left a spot that rubs. Most good boxer briefs come with a printed label & are shorter, so I might cut it off instead. As UnderArmour fails to catch up, it will be hard to compete. It was not worth it for me to purchase.
These underwear are super comfortable and are great to wear to the gym or as a daily wear item. You stay dry and comfortable since the wicking fabric does not absorb sweat. These are the best boxer briefs on the market because there are no seams running down the butt/back of legs, as most other performance boxer briefs do. This means that the briefs won't dig in Despite having a little ride up in the legs, they stay put the vast majority of the time and are quite I have a waist circumference of 32-33 inches These pants fit well in M even though I wear 31W pants most of the time. There is a little bit of a snug fit, but they stretch out a lot and are pretty The only thing I would change is I would not recommend these in hot weather (80F or higher), the mesh is not enough to allow for enough airflow around the legs and the tight fit makes them uncomfortable. The tan lines aren't normally noticeable to me, but during warm weather I find them a little UA makes a mesh version that I think would be much more efficient. Pair of Thieves' superfit mesh underwear is my preferred choice in hot weather, but UA's boxerjocks are still great in cold weather. When I go to buy these again I think I'd get the mesh version. In warmer climates, I wonder if they would be more comfortable if the length were shorter.
A new generation of flat front golf shorts made from stretchy synthetic materials has one drawback, that is, their slightly snug fit results in old golf balls getting stuck on them, when new golf balls are used to hold them. Made cotton boxer shorts so that the bottoms bunch up. It is not possible to wear one while wearing These Under Armour shorts were recommended by a friend, and although I've had a negative experience with boxer briefs, these shorts are a perfect fit for me. In comparison, they are a gazillion times more comfortable than the first pair of boxer briefs that appeared 20 years ago. Those original briefs were no better than wearing nothing but a pair of baseball slideshorts. It is the pouch in the front that makes the difference In terms of design and performance, it is as expected and hoped for.
The jewels are kept happy by the nice and cool fit.
Related Products For Under Armour Men's Tech 6-inch Boxerjock 2-Pack
