Canon CanoScan 9000F Color Image Scanner
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
That's one I'd have to say no to. It's the one I've got - The scanning area is 8 square feet. 75" by 12" is the legal size, according to my memory. Because it's 5" by 14", the extra 2" won't be needed. Aside from that, it has served me well for the majority of my requirements. I hope this has been of assistance to you.
If you're referring to the standard curl that can be found in a variety of products, Yes, cut negatives are flattened by the film holders. The 35- One or two strips of mm film can be held in a mm film holder, each with one-inch wide strips. Negatives number six.
It is capable of scanning 35mm film. I haven't tried those, but I did try scanning an 8 x 10 black and white photograph, which worked out okay, but you can only scan at a very low dpi when scanning that size, so it wasn't a good scan. It's all right, but it's not good. It can scan 35 millimeters at a much higher dpi, and I'm guessing the results will be quite good.
I'm guessing yes, because it has a film/slide holder, and I've scanned slides successfully before.
Selected User Reviews For Canon CanoScan 9000F Color Image Scanner
This scanner is fantastic! br>br> I like how you can scan multiple photos or slides at once and have them saved as separate photos "most of the time. " There have been a few occasions when three or four photos were all taken at the same time, but this does not occur frequently. I probably positioned them in such a way that the scanner had a hard time distinguishing them from one another. Hundreds of slides and photos have already been scanned by me. I really like how it saves them every time you scan. This allows me to edit them and save them in the appropriate folder. I've been working hard to organize my photos on my computer, and this scanner has been invaluable!br>br>Yes, it's pricey, but I'm glad I took the plunge and bought it. It is unquestionably worthwhile!.
In my case, the description (Very Good) did not seem to match the actual condition of the scanner I received (Good-). IMHO. ) The scanner had some noticeable scratches and signs of use on the top and sides, but it still works and does an excellent job with old photographs. And, after contacting the business (Prime Warehouse Inc) via email - We were able to find a place to stay - which, in my opinion, was reasonable and equitable in terms of price. The scanner arrived in excellent condition, and I was able to use it right away. Everything was in order, including the instructions. In my opinion, this is a reputable company, and I hope the scanner continues to function properly so that I can complete my projects. So - With used products, you never know what you'll get, but Prime Warehouse Inc. is a good bet. as a company that is responsive and fair. Lastly - For this scanner, don't bother with the Canon software. VueScan is a fantastic program that I use. It took a 1975 photograph of my father and stepmother and restored the color to match the original. It was my father, dressed as a "walking fruit salad. ".
I purchased this scanner several years ago with the intention of scanning all of my Grandparents' family photos and slides. That was a massive undertaking involving tens of thousands of photos (and that was after a lot of purging!). The fact that you can scan in film, slides, and it will auto crop photos so you can scan multiple at once (HUGE time saver with the amount of pictures I had to do at the time) was what sold me on this scanner at the time. The print quality was adequate, not outstanding, but adequate for the price; I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the film and slide scans, perhaps because it was my first time doing so. I wish I had kept a few more negatives! br>br>Overall, I was pleased with it, and it completed the project. Everyone now owns a duplicate of the old family photos:.
3 Lion! I've been scanning with Canon scanners for over 20 years. I put off upgrading my Mac Pro to OSX 10. 2 for a while. 3 Lion (starting with OS X 10. 6) Due to issues with Photoshop (older versions) and Canon scanner compatibility, Mac OS X (Snow Leopard) is no longer supported. Lion was forced on me when I bought a new Mac Pro a week ago. I bought Photoshop CS5, but my scanner was still the CanoScan 8400f (a super workhorse scanner!). In Lion, the 8400f was no longer supported by Canon in terms of drivers and software. A list of Lion-compatible scanners can be found on Canon's website. I bought a used 8600f from an auction website, and while CS5 recognized it, it was extremely slow and glitchy, crashing 2/3 of the scans. The 8600f is not listed on Apple's website as a Lion compatible scanner. The 5600f and 9000f (along with a few Lide scanners) are the only ones on the list. The gap between Canon's and Apple's websites is enormous. The drivers and software are available for download from Apple, and they were last updated in FEBRUARY 2012. In OCTOBER 2011, Canon released a new set of drivers and software. br>br>So, if you're debating whether or not to use a scanner with Mac OS X 10. 6, you've come to the right place. 3 Lion, the 9000f is without a doubt the best option. Installing the scanner is as easy as downloading it from Apple's website (throw away the outdated Canon discs) and connecting it to the power and USB ports. Reboot. When you start Photoshop, the 9000f and PS5 will automatically detect your scanner. The scans are extremely quick and precise. br>br>The 9000f has exceeded my expectations. I only wish I had purchased it when it was still available in December of 2011. It would have saved me the trouble of figuring out workarounds and compromises with different scanners.
This was primarily purchased to scan sports cards. I wanted a scanner that was not only smaller (physically), but also capable of scanning items with depth, such as cards in graded slabs or even items that just sit a little off the glass. I also wanted a scanner that could handle reflective surfaces more effectively. This scanner isn't going to let you down. It's the fastest scanner I've ever owned, and it handles everything I throw at it admirably. The slide and film attachments are also excellent, and as a result, I no longer use my slide scanner. br>br>As I don't use the included software, I can't say much about it. I wish Canon would include a batch scanning feature in their software so that I wouldn't have to rely on third-party scanning software. I usually scan 9 standard sports cards at a time, and I'd love to be able to do so with Canon's software, but it simply won't do edge detection and multiple file output in one pass like "Instant Photo Scanner" or "RansenScan" can. br>br>I would strongly advise anyone who requires a flatbed scanner for scanning more than flat, generic, matte-finish documents to purchase this. items to be completed.