Nikon W300 Waterproof Underwater Digital Camera with TFT LCD, 3", Black (26523)
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
Nikon Coolpix cameras seem to be plagued by this problem consistently. After purchasing an AW 100 without this problem, I then bought an AW 120 and that is when I first heard this noise. Thinking it was something loose in there, I returned it to the dealer to get a new I checked 6 other AW120's and they all had the same issue with them, so the salesperson and I verified it ourselves. After I took one of the cameras home and contacted Nikon about the sound, they said it was a problem with the camera and they were working to fix it. Evidently, someone dropped the ball, because this issue was also reported to have occurred in AW130s, and now I see that this issue was also reported to have occurred in the The Nikon D7000 is an excellent camera, fast, and accurate. Just sort out this stupid problem and you will have a great camera. If someone spends $400 on a new camera, they do not want it to rattle. We need to fix the dam!
It amazes me that someone has answered "No" to this question incorrectly! This is the correct answer It is true that when the W300 camera is set to "Use built-in location data" in the location data options menu, it starts receiving signals from positioning satellites and embeds location information in each image's EXIF data. It really is for this reason that you would want to have a GPS/GLONASS receiver in your Location data can be accurate up to a certain point, but it depends on how many satellites the camera is receiving signals from. If you are in an area that blocks satellite signals, location data will not be captured. There is an icon on the camera monitor when it is receiving signals that indicates how many satellite signals the camera is receiving, and what accuracy the location data will have. In order to get the most accurate location data, you should wait until the monitor shows that signals are coming from three or more satellites, which generally takes a few seconds after you turn on your camera.
A SD, SDHC, or SDXC memory card can be used with the camera. Furthermore, the camera supports SDHC and SDXC cards that comply with the UHS-I standards If you want to record 4K UHD movies, cards that rate UHS Speed Class 3 or faster are recommended. (SSD cards rated 6 or faster are recommended for recording 4K UHD movies with an image size/frame rate of 2160/30p or 2160/25p). In some cases, recording movies may stop abruptly if using a memory card with a lower Speed Class rating. plan to use a card reader, make sure it is compatible with your memory card. If it is not, contact the manufacturer for information on features, operation, and limitations. This can be found in the Coolpix W300 Quick Start Guide, page 54." There are 32 types of memory cards available for use
Canon lens, Nikon's COOLPIX W300 camera has been tested and approved for use with the following memory cards The following is a list of Sandisk's products. The following models are offered by Toshiba 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 256 and 512GB *br> Sony 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128GB Panasonic 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128GB There are 4 GB, 8 GB, 16 GB, 32 GB, 64 GB, and 128 GB Lexar Media models These external drives have 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, and 512GB of storage.
Selected User Reviews For Nikon W300 Waterproof Underwater Digital Camera with TFT LCD, 3", Black (26523)
A friend of mine recommended it to me.
You only need to stand five meters and take 50 minutes to get good pictures. This is an easy to use tool! The gun was pointed at me, and the shot was fired. Low light shots can be taken with ease thanks to the latitude of ISO. As for video, it worked well as well.
Although the Nikon AW140 is really the fourth camera in the series (following the AW100, AW110, AW120, and AW130), it does not have the name Nikon AW140. I would say that on paper, the W300 is not significantly superior to It lacks an improved sensor, an improved zoom, and while it has 4k, it does not have 4k at 60 frames per second. However, there are many others in the shadows that are keeping them hidden As a result- There are several improvements that make this camera significantly more efficient than the AW130/AW120 (which are practically It is much easier to adjust the image and video stabilization now. The old AW series had to deal with a lot of white balance and dynamic range issues. An exposure compensation and metering system was necessary in order to get images that were not over or underexposed. While the new W300 is consistently better at this, it does so more consistently. When photographing landscapes under overcast conditions, this is especially evident. D- was added by Nikon There is lighting on this camera as well, which is also very helpful. A nice plus was that they lowered the noise blur a bit. There are many old AW cameras that corrected noise, blurred the image aggressively, and then sharpened it, giving an image an appearance of 'water color'. There were some photos that were negatively affected by this. Taking shots of trees, for example, resulted in most of the leaves being smeared together to create an abstract painting. The situation has improved greatly since then. * There is a significant improvement to the screen, which in some ways may seem minor, but it helps you see if the shot came out okay when you take it. Despite all the upgrades, there are some downsides the camera is more heavy than the previous AW, and the map feature was axed, which I found very dissatisfying. If this can stand up to the Olympus TG-180, it proves to be a worthy rival I think you have a good point with question 5. A TG-like virus may be at play In 5 you have a better chance of capturing low-light shots Making videos underwater, taking light photos, and doing macro photography are some of the things I enjoy. It is likely that the W300 is a better camera for above-feet photography The video of water is better stabilized, has a better picture quality, and is more affordable than video of land.
For the month of September, I will be going to Australia with this camera. (That's why I bought it), so I was expecting it to be waterproof up to 100 feet. During our second week at the beach, we spent a day at the Great Barrier Reef. It was wonderful to take pictures, however, I put the camera in the water and the pictures no longer looked great. Upon soaking the screen in water for about ten minutes, a fogged up surface appeared. There was no way for me to take photos with it after that. Then I tried to charge it again after opening it up a couple of days to let it dry out. I had to use my phone camera to take pictures the rest of the trip after the camera almost caught fire. There was a lot of upset in me. Since it was purchased in May 2018, Amazon would not take it back as it had been purchased in May 2018. The Nikon company has repaired the major damages under warranty because it was sent to them. It will all depend on what happens.