* Disclaimer: OveReview is reader-supported. We earn commissions from qualifying purchases
Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002 Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002 Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002 Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002

Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002

Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002 Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002 Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002 Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002
$ 2,699.00

Score By Feature

Based on 256 ratings
Picture quality
9.70
Versatility
9.70
Auto focus
9.58
Image stabilization
9.68
Quality of material
9.48
Value for money
9.38

OveReview Final Score

How Our Score Is Calculated

Product Description

By entering your model number, you can make sure that this fits.
Image quality is excellent, and the f/2 aperture provides plenty of light. RF L lens with an aperture of 8 for a telephoto zoom.
It's small and light.
With up to 5 stops of shake correction, optical image stabilization is available.
Autofocus with dual Nano USM is fast, smooth, and quiet.
A focusing distance of two is the absolute minimum. 3 ft. by 0. 7 M.
Canon Full Frame Mirrorless Cameras (EOS RP, EOS R, EOS R5, EOS R6) are compatible with this lens.

Questions & Answers

Is there a Lens Hood included?

A lens hood will be included as part of our package.

Would you be concerned about the weight of this lens when used as a walk-around lens on an eos rp lens mount? in the vicinity of the camera?

Not if your lens is properly carried and mounted. I wouldn't use the tripod mounting point on the camera to attach my camera and this lens to my tripod. Rather, I'd attach the lens to the tripod using the tripod mounting bracket that came with the lens. Because the camera (485g) is lighter than the lens (1,070g), the lens mount will be less stressed. Similarly, when shooting hand-held, I always ensure that one hand is on the barrel and the other is on the camera. When carrying the camera on a strap with this lens attached, the locking switch on the right hand side of the lens can be used to prevent the lens from telescoping out while walking. Before you attempt to zoom the lens, make sure the small switch is unlocked. It's worth noting that Canon's locking switch is turned on. Only when the lens is fully zoomed in to 70mm can it be engaged. It's not meant to "lock" the lens in place at a specific focal length. While I haven't tried it, I imagine that forcing the switch into the locked position while at a focal length other than 70mm, or zooming the lens while the locking switch is set, could damage the switch. That's something I'll leave to someone else to try on a $2700 piece of glass. This lens is significantly lighter than the EF mount equivalent in terms of overall comfort. Although I own an EOS R rather than an EOS RP, the weight of the two bodies is nearly identical (RP=485g vs R=660g). With a good camera strap, I can comfortably carry this lens as my primary lens for several hours. It captures phenomal images as well as the f2. 8 across the entire focal length range allows me to shoot in low light without having to increase the ISO or use long shutter speeds (although several other features of the lens and image sensor address both of these issues as well). It's a fantastic lens in every way.

What's the contents of the package?

Because my mine had never been opened, I didn't go any further than peering down from the top layer. The lens, end caps, tripod mount, and lens hood were all included in the box, along with an instructional pamphlet, warranty registration card, lens pouch/case, and the lens itself.

Is it likely that dust and other particles will be able to get in through the zooming in and out?

Although the seals may wear out over time, careful handling may prolong the weatherproofing's effectiveness.

Selected User Reviews For Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002

(Almost
5/5

) The Ultimate Telephoto Zoom Lens (See the change).   EDIT: 1/8/2020br>As a result, Canon has released firmware version 1. I'm six years old, and I've recently upgraded my lens. I can confirm that the front focusing issue has been resolved based on my unscientific test shots. Funny thing is, since I've been using it, I've never shot MFD at 200mm in real life. But it's good to know it's fixed, and Canon deserves credit for acting quickly to address the issue. Also, you'll be pleased to know that I tested it in slightly harsher conditions and it performed admirably; I took it out in the rain and to some dustier locations with no problems, so it's back to 5 stars. EDIT: br>br> 12/3/2019br>All right, it came to my attention that some others were having issues with this lens front focusing when shooting wide open and at a minimum focus distance. I took it upon myself to put it to the test. I took a shot at a small figure with multiple towers. I pointed it at a back-of-house tower. Sure enough, the tower in front of you appears to be sharper. Others have used a target card to conduct far more scientific tests, revealing that the lens front focuses by about 3mm. It's inconsequential, but it exists. Because of this, I've reduced the rating from 5 to 3 stars, as this is clearly a flaw for something so high-end. I mean, it's a very unique case shooting wide open and MFD, so it still works in most other cases; it's just that you have to use manual focus if you need to hit focus on a razor thin DOF from up close. I'm hopeful that a fix is on the way, as it appears that Canon service centers are aware of the problem, as I'm aware of others who have sent their lenses in for repair, and the problem appears to be universal and repeatable. That's encouraging news for a firmware update that will hopefully fix the front focusing problem for everyone. Once it's fixed, I'll gladly reinstate the stars. Original: br>br>Original: br>br>Original: br>br>Orig br>br>I preordered it and received it today, so these are my first impressions of the lens. I'll keep you updated as I put it to use. I'm not a professional photographer, but I enjoy taking pictures and making videos. So I'm a hybrid photographer who shoots both stills and moving images. I'm completely blown away by this lens after only a few hours with it. br>br>Constructionbr>I've never owned an EF 70-200mm lens before. 200 f2. I don't know how they compare because they're 8L. I know it's lighter than the EF version, and the big selling point is that at 70mm, it transforms into a short, stubby lens. Many people I know choose to leave the EF version at home due to its size and weight. This will feel lighter in your hands and, more importantly, will take up less space in your camera bag at its smallest size. It is about the same length as the EF version when fully extended to 200mm. The ergonomics are familiar, and it feels solid in the hand. The focus and zoom rings are smooth and pleasant to use, but the control ring is too tight and loud for my tastes. When shooting video, turning the control ring causes camera shake, which is picked up by a microphone. My other lenses have been declicked as well. If they come back and fix these problems, I'll send this guy to make the changes as well. Some people are worried that because this lens extends rather than being a fixed lens like the EF version, it will attract dust. They claim it's weather sealed, but I'll need more time with this lens before I can comment on whether or not it has any issues. I don't abuse my lenses too much, and I don't shoot in extreme conditions. A windy beach with fine sand might be the worst place to go, but I'll let you know if I run into any problems. The lens hood is cool. I'm not sure why, but I like how it goes with the lens. The EF versions, I believe, have a black hood, whereas this one is white and looks cool. It has a sliding window that opens to allow you access to circular polarizers and variable ND filters. Auto Focusbr>Wow! br>br>Wow! br>br>Wow! br>br>Wow! br>b This has completely blown me away. I have the most recent version of the EOS R 1. At the time of writing this review, the camera was running firmware version 4, and the autofocus was lightning fast. I swear I'm hitting focus more often with the R and RF lenses than with my other camera, a 5D Mk IV, and I swear I'm hitting focus more often with the R and RF lenses. It's no different with this lens. Another thing that astounds me is how deafeningly quiet the focus is. It's so quiet that I can't even hear it. at all! You won't be able to hear it if there's some background noise. If you put it close to your head in complete silence, you can hear the faint clicking. It does have a dual motor USM system, which I believe is a first for Canon, and if that's why it's so quiet, I'm impressed! The RF 50, by comparison, has some noise, while the RF 24- has none. 70 has become a little more quiet. This lens is completely silent even when there is some background noise. br>br>Image Qualitybr>At first, I had no intention of purchasing an EOS R. I was looking forward to the "pro" version. I'd always planned on getting into the system because the RF lenses are almost always guaranteed to produce stunning images. There were two major shifts. As the RF lens lineup grew, so did the price of the EOS R. So that's where I am. I couldn't say no to the delicious RF glass. I mean, I set a pretty high bar for myself in terms of expectations. I can only state that I have not been disappointed. The photos I took were of various objects around the house, but the detail, edge-to-edge sharpness, color rendering, smooth bokeh, and lack of distortion are all excellent. My favorite focal length is telephoto, and this lens is practically perfect. To give you a sense of scale, I'm a 70-year-old woman with a 70- 300mm f4. 6 as well as a 100mm f2 lens. Macro is a number that starts with 0 and ends with a number that starts My non-photographic eyeballs are blown away by the image quality. The L EF lens has been blown out of the water. Many people consider the 100mm to be one of the sharpest lenses available. I believe this is on par with the Macro based on the few images I have. br>br>Low Lightbr>I just did a few tests quickly. The AF is just as quick at night as it is during the day if there is just enough light on a subject. I set my ISO to 6400 and the noise level is excellent in my opinion. The f2. The eight aperture and three levels of stabilization are extremely beneficial. In relation to that. br>br>Image Stabilizationbr>Okay, there are three levels of image stabilization. I'm not sure if I'm making the best use of them. Level 1 is for a single shot, according to the description. Panning is done at level two. And then there's level 3, which only comes on when you're exposed to something. It's fantastic for video. To see the difference, watch the two videos of the bird on a wire. (Edit: I was only able to upload one video; I'll make a composite in the future. ) I also enjoyed the nighttime shots. The night shots are insanely sharp, despite the fact that I didn't stop the exposure down too much. br>br>Videobr>The video quality is excellent. Some of the advantages and disadvantages have already been mentioned. Because the focus motor is extremely quiet, it will not be picked up by a microphone. The pulling of the focus was lightning fast. As you can see in the video below. I didn't fiddle with the camera settings, but I believe they could be slowed down for a smoother focus pull. During the shoot, the control ring is inoperable. It's too loud and too tense at the same time. If you don't plan on having it declicked, it's best used for pre-production. ISO, exposure compensation, and other settings can be tweaked in post-production. At the very least, you'll be less likely to make a mistake. br>br>Samplesbr>These are JPG and MP4 files straight from the camera. Yes, there is such a thing as Canon Color Science. Unfortunately, I believe I can only upload one video, so it is the image stabilized bird on a wire. br>br>Conclusionbr>I expect this to become a standard for professional wedding photographers, sports photographers, and wildlife photographers who invest in the RF system. They'll probably like the new, smaller and lighter form factor. However, I believe that anyone who has the financial means to do so will find it enjoyable. Although the price is high, I believe it is well worth the money. It's just that much better in terms of handling and being able to focus a higher percentage of the time. Keep in mind, I've only had it for a couple hours, but just handling it, I could tell it would perform when put through its paces.

Aspen Booth
Aspen Booth
| Jul 04, 2021
This lens is much smaller and more compact than the EF 70-200mm lens
5/5

The picture quality is incredible.

Edgar DODD
Edgar DODD
| Jun 27, 2021
It's razor-sharp, small, adaptable, and
5/5

a wonderful tactile sensation In comparison to the EF equivalent, it feels like a significant improvement. I'm not in a position to compare the two lenses scientifically, but my overall impression is that they are very similar. as well as feedback from other experienced photographers - is that, even at f 2, this lens produces exceptionally sharp images. br>The 5-point checklist is a great way to get started. With a focal length of 150 mm and a shutter speed of almost embarrassing values (1/20), stop image stabilization is an added bonus that results in sharp images. br>Advantages on the side - This is something that is frequently mentioned at the start of a technical review. are the dimensions and weight It is much smaller and lighter than its EF counterpart, making long-term shooting easier, simpler, and more enjoyable.

Kayson Salinas
Kayson Salinas
| Jan 15, 2021
This is an excellent lens
5/5

incredibly sharp This lens is extremely well-kept. It's very sharp, and there's no vignetting that I can see. It's a breeze to use with the Canon R6, and the auto focus is superb. It's thick and wide, and it reminds me of the old 50L 1. 2. When my camera is turned on, I am unable to use my Lower Slingshot 100 because it is unable to zip up. I can still use the case if I take the lens out of the camera, but that's not fun, so I'm on the lookout for a new small-camera case. It fits in a ish bag on the camera. br>br>My first copy of the lens from Amazon had a minor flaw: when I extended it, some of the weather sealing rubbery string protruded 1" from the lens. Returning and replacing items from Amazon is extremely simple, so I did so, and my second copy is flawless, with the added benefit of easier zooming. br>br>Worked extremely quickly and with extreme focus to capture moving dogs and children, which are always the most difficult to photograph. I'm looking forward to shooting sports with it. I've included some screenshots as an example.

Annabella Dougherty
Annabella Dougherty
| Jan 13, 2021
This is fantastic
4/5

The only criticism I have of this lens is that it is pricey, which is why it receives four stars (in terms of value). It was a real pleasure to use it. The image quality is excellent. The ability to focus quickly. Sharp. I'm at a loss for words. Get it if you have the money. br>br>I returned it for my purposes because I expect to stay above f4 with a 70-mm lens in the future. In the majority of cases, I'd like to use 200. I used the lens to photograph a wedding reception and didn't pay attention to the aperture, which was f2. When I was filming the first dance from 30 feet away, 8 bit me. When it happened, I was about 40 feet away. Using the f4 version will most likely force me to take better pictures as I improve my focus and pay attention to my settings. Again, there's nothing wrong with this lens, but the $1000 I'll save with an f4 lens that helps me avoid a shallow depth of field is more my speed right now. br>br>If you look at the attached images, you can see where I screwed up my settings with the groom. f2. 1/640th of a second at 8, 177mm, ISO 2000. The image quality is displayed on the other side. Both images were shot with the same settings. Once again, this is a fantastic lens for those who don't get caught up in the moment and forget their settings. I'll be back for this, Dbr>br>Dbr>br>Dbr>br>Dbr>br>I'll be back.

Zayden Deleon
Zayden Deleon
| Apr 10, 2021
This is a fantastic lens that is well worth the money
5/5

This is an excellent lens. It's exactly what we've come to expect from the Rf L lens. Images of exceptional quality. Auto focus is quick, and the camera is well-balanced. It's also quick and easy to read. I can shoot wide open with a shutter speed of 200 thanks to the 5 stops of IS, and the results are fantastic.

Belle Franklin
Belle Franklin
| Mar 10, 2021
Best 70- There are 200 available on the market
5/5

Both the R and the RP have incredible sharpness and clarity. This is the most effective 70-minute workout ever. There are 200 available on the market. That's before we get into how much lighter and more portable it is than its older EF mount sibling. If you're carrying it for some close-up street photography, you won't necessarily fail the awkwardly large lens test unless you keep the barrel fully extended and the massive lens hood with you. The zoom ring travel is slightly longer than the EF versions of the mk2 and mk3, but this is an acceptable trade-off given that the lens is only 2/3 the length of the mk2 and mk3 versions.

Major Donovan
Major Donovan
| Jun 13, 2021

Related Products For Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Lens, Telephoto Zoom Lens, 3792C002