Kodak 6034052 Ultra Max 400 Film (Blue/Yellow)
Score By Feature
OveReview Final Score
Product Description
Questions & Answers
It's 35 mm film, not a digital photo. A 110 is a different kind of 110.
Firstly, the C41 process allows anyone to develop it because it is an open standard. Please accept my best regards, Steve 1 The 800-number The 221-222
In my opinion, the Fuji has always been somewhat warmer than the Kodaks, but both of them are certainly comparable in terms of
It's unfortunate I don't have an answer to your question. The whole roll of film was used, I had it developed, and I
Selected User Reviews For Kodak 6034052 Ultra Max 400 Film (Blue/Yellow)
The rolls of Kodak Ultramax arrived three at a time. It is now past the expiration date of.
Having an analog look and feel is what I miss most about this style of photography. My friend picked me up a Sears KS1000, so I went out and bought some Kodak UltraMax 400 (24 exposure version) to take pictures. This was my first attempt at box speed operation and I am very satisfied with what the camera and film produced. Beautiful colors with a warmth and depth to them. My childhood and travels with Kodak film are a great representation of how Kodak hasn't lost its touch and is truly reminiscent of my childhood. There is no doubt that I will be back again.
Having not shot film in many years, I decided to see if my 1961 Nikon F was still up to the task. It was a pleasant surprise to discover Kodak film when I had no idea what sort of luck I would have finding it. In the past, I used to shoot at This 400 film will require some getting used to since I'm used to 100. Seeing the results may cause me to rethink how I am going to continue shooting digitally. Not at all! It's important to put everything in its proper You can set, but there is a catch Film photographs are hard to beat when it comes to uptime.
I had a Nikon N90 which I haven't used in years, but I wanted to take it out again, even though we all live in a digital world. It was for testing whether I would be able to take good pictures with this 35mm film that I purchased. Despite my high expectations, I was pleasantly surprised by this film. Most of the pictures I take with my digital camera aren't as good as those I obtained with film. It is a very good film for anyone who is considering going back to film photography.
Having a camera that is compact and has a great zoom has been ideal for my daughter who has a passion for When it comes to my opinion, 35mm is better than digital at times. So, I decided to give my daughter several rolls of this film to experiment with since I used to use it all the time.
The film I purchased was for comparing my older 35mm lenses and cameras with my latest digital cameras. This data speaks for itself. On the left, you can see digital, while on the right, you can see film. The cost of the film was about $25 the cost of the development was $2 and the cost of the digital prints was nil because I already had over a thousand hard copies. Sharpness and color quality are better in the digital format.
Even though I am using a digital camera, I still use As I had not been able to obtain the movie for the last two years, I went on line and got it! So glad I did! This film has been my favorite for years, and I want to keep it that way Taking great photos with this camera! I appreciate your help and thanks again After this batch is used up, I'll need more!.
A good skin tone reproduction and overall pleasing results can be found in this general purpose film. There is crude grain in it, but it's not an issue for professionals. For some people, it can be irritating. There is no value in this product, and it is too expensive. Before, that film used to be extremely cheap, but it's now quite expensive.