Jiusion 2K HD 2560x1440P USB Digital Microscope for Android Cellphone and Tablet Windows Mac Linux, 40X to 1000X Magnification Endoscope Handheld Mini Magnifier Camera for Coin Facial Skin Scalp

The colored image depicts a 27-conductor-per-millimeter electrical ribbon connector. There are 54 lines per single mm with 27 voids. This, I believe, should be the end of your assessment of its capabilities. br>br>In comparison to the previous model (X001C7XY8B), the new "2k HD" model (X002WXP5VD) uses a pushbutton for light control rather than the previously in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in-built in I kind of miss having a line dimmer. The "Zoom" button has been removed (which I also miss), and I like the additional printed indexing arrow that makes it easier to position the image (I won't have to use white-out this time. )br>br>The'scope worked well with both my Win10 desktop computer's USB2 port and an Android 7. 0 smartphone, as well as a version of Android 4. 0 tablet. Different characteristics appear with different components in the world of electronic chips. br>br> With this model's on/off switch, you can easily switch from one mode to the other. I noticed less contrast, and the color and depth of field focusing appear to be the same as the previous model - Both of which I find acceptable. br>br>The new "HD" view is wider (16:9) in real-time use. 9) and appears to limit zooming (magnification) capabilities, which I find to be inconvenient. The image with the smaller digits is from a newer model, while the image with the larger digits is from an older model - Each image has a resolution of 640x480 pixels and a resolution of 96 pixels per inch. So, is "HD" on a widescreen "better"? Perhaps in marketing, but not exclusively in use in my opinion. Note: To demonstrate magnification differences, the newer model's image file was cropped to a similar size as the previous model's. br>br>While captured photos have a greater optical range, a larger photographed area requires less zooming in a photo viewer, resulting in less effective magnification. When the CoolingTech software was set to its highest resolution of 1440 pixels, it failed to capture a photo (I assume the software can't handle that picture size; the photo was black). As a result, I've come up with another "mistake. " claimer" with a resolution of 2560x1440 - Will you be able to use it even if it has that capacity? The best I could get with the smartphone HD capture was a 1280x720 image. I tried everything I could think of with the desktop software programs, but all I got were 640x480 images. As a result, I'm not sure the software is taking advantage of its full potential when it comes to captured photos, e. g. 960 dpi, 640x480 pixels , with a skewed aspect ratio Although the wide-screen dimensions are appealing for a large format TV screen/monitor, they aren't of the utmost importance in terms of functionality because much of the image is extra baggage with wide-screen. br>br>The stance remains the same, and despite being widely panned, it is entirely satisfactory. This type of microscope is designed to move around the object, whereas a traditional microscope requires the object to be brought to it. As a result, even a smaller stand is preferable because it is less inconvenient - Perhaps a longer arm would help. All it has to do is keep the scope from tipping over. br>br>Ironically, in my daily use, I prefer the previous model (X001C7XY8B). br>The new model (X002WXP5VD) has the ability to produce more detailed zoomed/cropped photos, but I'm not sure if it's been used yet. br>br>I propose that the digital Zoom button be reinstated, as well as in-app purchases. If possible, a line dimmer, which would be more than enough for the majority of users.

London Church

| May 15, 2021

This is my first USB "magnifier," and after some research and comparisons of the maximum magnification between this and 100X reference images I found online, I discovered that it is NOT 1000X, but rather close to 100X. br>Does a magnifying glass of 100X qualify as a "microscope"? I'm not sure what I'm saying. br>I don't believe it's a typo in the description because all of the brands selling the same Chinese scope claim the same thing, and if you know what you're selling, you'd never make such "typos. " So - For deceiving customers, you get a two-star rating. Having said that, 100X is good enough for me, and for the price, it's a steal. br>br>Follow-up: br>br>Follow-up: br>br> br>It's compatible with both Android and Windows 10. The price is unbeatable.

Jacqueline Duke

| Oct 27, 2021

I ordered another because I gave the first to a family member as a parting gift before they left for college. They are fascinated by insects and use it to study them at home as well as in the field, as these microscopes can be used with a computer or a smartphone! My personal interests are in mycology, so I enjoy taking this microscope into the field with me when I go mushroom hunting so that I can get up close and personal with the various features of a mushroom to aid in identification. It is also easily portable due to its small size, and it does not require any additional external power. It's as simple as plugging it into your phone or computer and you're ready to go. I also like the connector on the end of the cord because it allows me to use it with my phone or computer with ease. The disadvantages: br>br> I wish there was some kind of indicator to let me know what magnification I'm using at any given time, as it would be useful when I'm recording data from the field. However, this is a minor flaw, and for the price, it performs admirably for what I need it to do. However, because I don't have a lab-quality microscope to compare it to (yet), I can't tell if the magnification levels are actually what they say they are. Overall: br>br> I really like this little microscope, and the company has been very responsive in their communications with me (especially when I had a minor issue with the first one because it didn't come with instructions like this one does). So they assisted me in determining what I was doing incorrectly, and everything turned out fine). It's difficult to find a better value for the money. It isn't a very high-quality product. end lab- It's not a top-of-the-line piece of gear, but it's fantastic for something portable and easy to transport into the field. br>br>I'd recommend it to anyone who enjoys looking at small details in the outdoors!.

Remy Soto

| Jul 07, 2021

A few months ago, we purchased this. It necessitates the installation of one of several apps, which may or may not be compatible with your phone. We were able to locate one of the apps that did. It did an excellent job of what it was designed to do, greatly enlarging the image of the object it was pointing to. In my case, I wanted to be able to examine a spot on my skin that I couldn't see clearly due to its location. It wouldn't be enough for me to take a photo with my phone. It worked perfectly for that, but it also appears to be well-designed for any situation in which you need something significantly enlarged. It appears to be well-made and at a reasonable price; the only reason I gave it four stars instead of five is that the manufacturer is not taking responsibility for ensuring that the app is compatible with the wide range of phones available. The microscope will be useless if the next phone I purchase does not support these third-party apps.

Eliseo Keller

| Jul 29, 2021