B + W 95mm UV Protection Filter (010) for Camera Lens – Standard Mount (F-PRO), MRC, 16 Layers Multi-Resistant Coating, Photography Filter, 95 mm, Clear Protector

5 G at 75mm. Contemporary in size - 600mm. For my Sigma 150, I like to use this filter (95mm). I used both a 600mm version of the Canon 2xIII extender and a contemporary version. It reduces the aperture from 1200mm (f/13) to 600mm (f/13). I need a filter to put most light into (>). About 98%) of the test must be passed. When buying my UV Filter, I had several thoughts in my mind:

- The cost is my Sigma 150. $700 is only the price of a 600mm lens. filters costs $120; they make up 17% of the lens cost. What are my options with all those money?
- Pass with low light. A percentage through rate from the borrower. Though cheaper filters cost less than $ 50, they let less light pass (> 90). 95%). A fairly heavy light bulb is optimal in the setup I have (f/13). However, the majority of B+W filters enable more than 98 percent light.
- Material for the ng atrams. (e. g. , L'Oreal, etc. ) are well known names. As a result, Filter One, Formatt Hitech, or Sigma filter rings made excellent glass, but their rings weren't sturdy enough to hold the pieces. An easily detached glass can appear after being exposed to constant use. Unlike standard gold earrings, B+W rings are crafted with brass. Unlike aluminum, which is lighter, it's a better material for holding the glass.
- Multifamily. One-sided and two-sided coatings. Compared to single-coated wood, single-coated wood costs 20% less. Choosing the correct multi-lens can help you avoid lens flare when shooting under the sun. coated. Finally, after biting into the bullet, I clicked on the order button after all. The result is very satisfying to me.

Alena Mason

| Sep 03, 2021

It was, in my opinion, nothing more than a false product. The item was returned to me.

Thaddeus Donahue

| Apr 12, 2021

I only wanted this UV filter to ensure the lenses surface were protected. It is definitely worth the cost. The purchase was well worth the money. I received the filter in pristine condition and found that it did fit properly. I have tested it over a thousand times and have not found any evidence it changes image quality. Lower quality may also make life more inexpensive. Why invest in expensive filters for use on an expensive camera and lens? only to put cheap filters to good use. Get it right the first time.

Kaiser Herrera

| May 08, 2021

The flare to my Sigma 150 makes it appear more cloudy, and I sometimes get ghostiness from the ghosting. 600 The clear filters I have other B+W clear filters (to use this one).

Roger Short

| Apr 08, 2021

The Nikon 200-rated as the finest and best I could find. In order to keep the lens safe, it was important to use an UV filter to protect its 500mm diameter. The first time I purchased it, I gave it two years after it was purchased. With this one, the quality of other kinds is comparable. The picture looks clear and professional to me. There is no need to believe it's a fake photo or worse yet, even a bad picture. It features all the best features of UV filter and its wide array of uses. Even though the coating is only coated a coating, I'll finish using them long term because it's my preferred product.

Marlowe Roth

| Jul 15, 2021

After comparing this product against others, it appears impossible to determine its appropriate rating. This is the first time a business has owned a car. I have purchased a roxtail. It should appear that the filter package had been used before it arrived, as it had been opened when it arrived. Dust and smudges could clearly be observed on the filter. Even though I tried to wipe away the smudges using a lens cloth, the clumps remained. When I returned the item for another filter, nothing else was apparent. In the second filter, too, the seal was broken and smudges were visible throughout. In response to my frustration, I decided I would just keep it and leave the rest to rot out at the end of the night. I am still not satisfied with the dish. Having previously dirty coated metals in the factory (or warehouse) is no longer a good idea, because this material can often prove difficult to clean. These problems with Hoya filters were never part of my experience.

Denise Lucas

| Jan 19, 2022

This filter makes it impossible to focus one picture at a time when I purchased my new Nikon 500mm PF. The entire experience of using a tripod on a remote lacked focus. In three days, I returned to my perfect lens as it was dropped off. As it turned out, there wasn't any need to downgrade this filter, as the filtering looked incredible, so I guess everyone should wait till we see how it does. Returned.

Rex Coffey

| Jul 20, 2021

A tape-lined filter box was tored. As far as I was concerned, it was purchased and returned to me. With binoculars, I determined the filter was clear and unmarked, right down to the barcode. Almost certainly not I'll return it (they won't even tell me if I bought it second hand), but buying a used product and knowing that I paid for it seems deceptive.

Duncan Owen

| Feb 21, 2022